NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 64 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Séverin Lions; María Paz Blanco; Pablo Dartnell; Carlos Monsalve; Gabriel Ortega; Julie Lemarié – Applied Measurement in Education, 2024
Multiple-choice items are universally used in formal education. Since they should assess learning, not test-wiseness or guesswork, they must be constructed following the highest possible standards. Hundreds of item-writing guides have provided guidelines to help test developers adopt appropriate strategies to define the distribution and sequence…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Multiple Choice Tests, Guidelines, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Philip Newton; Maira Xiromeriti – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
Media coverage suggests that ChatGPT can pass examinations based on multiple choice questions (MCQs), including those used to qualify doctors, lawyers, scientists etc. This poses a potential risk to the integrity of those examinations. We reviewed current research evidence regarding the performance of ChatGPT on MCQ-based examinations in higher…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Artificial Intelligence, Integrity, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Falcão, Filipe; Costa, Patrício; Pêgo, José M. – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2022
Background: Current demand for multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in medical assessment is greater than the supply. Consequently, an urgency for new item development methods arises. Automatic Item Generation (AIG) promises to overcome this burden, generating calibrated items based on the work of computer algorithms. Despite the promising scenario,…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items, Medical Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Sibic, Okan; Sesen, Burcin Acar – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2022
One of the main goals of science education is to make students gain science process skills. Thus, it is significant to measure whether students gain those skills or not. For this purpose, various tests have been produced and used in various studies. This study aims to examine science process skills tests which have been used in the theses produced…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Science Education, Science Process Skills, Masters Theses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ato Kwamina Arhin – Acta Educationis Generalis, 2024
Introduction: This article aimed at digging deep into distractors used for mathematics multiple-choice items. The quality of distractors may be more important than their number and the stem in a multiple-choice question. Little attention is given to this aspect of item writing especially, mathematics multiple-choice questions. This article…
Descriptors: Testing, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Items, Mathematics Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yi-Chun Chen; Hsin-Kai Wu; Ching-Ting Hsin – Research in Science & Technological Education, 2024
Background and Purpose: As a growing number of instructional units have been developed to promote young children's scientific and engineering practices (SEPs), understanding how to evaluate and assess children's SEPs is imperative. However, paper-and-pencil assessments would not be suitable for young children because of their limited reading and…
Descriptors: Science Education, Engineering Education, Elementary School Students, Middle School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lions, Séverin; Monsalve, Carlos; Dartnell, Pablo; Blanco, María Paz; Ortega, Gabriel; Lemarié, Julie – Applied Measurement in Education, 2022
Multiple-choice tests are widely used in education, often for high-stakes assessment purposes. Consequently, these tests should be constructed following the highest standards. Many efforts have been undertaken to advance item-writing guidelines intended to improve tests. One important issue is the unwanted effects of the options' position on test…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, High Stakes Tests, Test Construction, Guidelines
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tortorelli, Laura S.; Lupo, Sarah M.; Wheatley, Barbara C. – Reading Research Quarterly, 2021
Advocates of the science of reading have argued that (a) teacher preparation programs do not provide adequate preparation to teach code-related reading skills; (b) as a result, teachers lack knowledge of this area of literacy development; and (c) without that knowledge, teachers are unable to effectively teach students to read. In this integrative…
Descriptors: Preservice Teacher Education, Preservice Teachers, Reading Instruction, Decoding (Reading)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jay Parkes – Journal of Faculty Development, 2021
Brief multiple-choice question workshops are a prevalent part of the faculty development landscape. But do they work? Studies have documented that faculty member-written multiple-choice questions (fMCQs) are frequently flawed and do not live up to quality standards. Poor fMCQs have real consequences for students beyond annoyance. Fourteen studies…
Descriptors: Teacher Workshops, Multiple Choice Tests, Faculty Development, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Langlois, Jean; Bellemare, Christian; Toulouse, Josée; Wells, George A. – Anatomical Sciences Education, 2017
Anatomy knowledge has been found to include both spatial and non-spatial components. However, no systematic evaluation of studies relating spatial abilities and anatomy knowledge has been undertaken. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the relationship between spatial abilities test and anatomy knowledge assessment. A…
Descriptors: Anatomy, Spatial Ability, Knowledge Level, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Chang, Frederic Tao-Yi; Li, Mao-Neng Fred – International Journal of Educational Technology, 2019
IF-AT (also called answer until correct) is a revised form of traditional multiple-choice testing. It was created to provide instant feedback during testing and to tap into partial knowledge of learners. The purposes of this meta-analytic study were to compare the effectiveness of IF-AT with the traditional multiple-choice test; to assess…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Feedback (Response), Answer Sheets
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yanagisawa, Akifumi; Webb, Stuart; Uchihara, Takumi – Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2020
This meta-analysis investigated the overall effects of glossing on L2 vocabulary learning from reading and the influence of potential moderator variables: gloss format (type, language, mode) and text and learner characteristics. A total of 359 effect sizes from 42 studies (N = 3802) meeting the inclusion criteria were meta-analyzed. The results…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gierl, Mark J.; Bulut, Okan; Guo, Qi; Zhang, Xinxin – Review of Educational Research, 2017
Multiple-choice testing is considered one of the most effective and enduring forms of educational assessment that remains in practice today. This study presents a comprehensive review of the literature on multiple-choice testing in education focused, specifically, on the development, analysis, and use of the incorrect options, which are also…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Difficulty Level, Accuracy, Error Patterns
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Opitz, Ansgar; Heene, Moritz; Fischer, Frank – Educational Research and Evaluation, 2017
Education systems increasingly emphasize the importance of scientific reasoning skills such as "generating hypotheses" and "evaluating evidence." Despite this importance, we do not know which tests of scientific reasoning exist, which skills they emphasize, how they conceptualize scientific reasoning, and how well they are…
Descriptors: Thinking Skills, Logical Thinking, Science Process Skills, Science Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gurel, Derya Kaltakci; Eryilmaz, Ali; McDermott, Lillian Christie – EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2015
Different diagnostic tools have been developed and used by researchers to identify students' conceptions. The present study aimed to provide an overview of the common diagnostic instruments in science to assess students' misconceptions. Also the study provides a brief comparison of these common diagnostic instruments with their strengths and…
Descriptors: Scientific Concepts, Misconceptions, Comparative Analysis, Diagnostic Tests
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5