Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 1 |
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Discipline Policy | 1 |
| Discipline Problems | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Identification | 1 |
| Integrity | 1 |
| Intention | 1 |
| Investigations | 1 |
| Judges | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research Evaluation | 1 |
Author
| Olivier Leclerc | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| France | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkOlivier Leclerc – Research Evaluation, 2025
Detecting and punishing violations of research integrity requires first having to prove them. However, establishing proof of research misconduct presents a number of challenges. Firstly, it has to be conducted in a variety of contexts, including before research integrity officers, university disciplinary committees, civil courts, criminal courts,…
Descriptors: Cheating, Research, Identification, Integrity
