Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
College Faculty | 3 |
College Students | 3 |
Expertise | 3 |
Novices | 3 |
Problem Solving | 3 |
Concept Formation | 2 |
Biology | 1 |
Cognitive Measurement | 1 |
Cognitive Science | 1 |
Cognitive Structures | 1 |
College Instruction | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Gogus, Aytac | 3 |
Koszalka, Tiffany A. | 1 |
Spector, J. Michael | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
Turkey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gogus, Aytac – Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 2012
This study used HIMATT (Highly Interactive Model-based Assessment Tools and Technologies) to evaluate the cognitive models of individuals who are solving complex mathematical problems. The goal was to determine the ability of HIMATT to assess learning in mathematics. Research on cognitive and mental models proposes that internal conceptual systems…
Descriptors: Schemata (Cognition), Problem Solving, Mathematics, Evaluation Methods
Gogus, Aytac – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2013
Cognitive scientists investigate mental models (how humans organize and structure knowledge in their minds) so as to understand human understanding of and interactions with the world. Cognitive and mental model research is concerned with internal conceptual systems that are not easily or directly observable. The goal of this research was to…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Software Evaluation, College Students, Comparative Analysis
Gogus, Aytac; Koszalka, Tiffany A.; Spector, J. Michael – Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 2009
This paper presents research findings related to the "Dynamic Enhanced Evaluation of Problem Solving (DEEP)" (Spector & Koszalka, 2004) methodology for assessing how participants conceptualize ill-defined problems in biology using annotated concept maps. The methodology engages highly experienced (expert) and less experienced…
Descriptors: Problems, Biology, Concept Mapping, Individual Differences