NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 13 results Save | Export
Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. House Committee on Education and Labor. – 1985
The transcript of the 1985 House of Representatives hearings on reauthorization of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 contains verbatim testimony and committee questions, prepared statements, letters, and supplemental material. Organizations providing testimony or statements include the following: Council of State Administrators of Vocational…
Descriptors: Advocacy, Disabilities, Federal Legislation, Hearings
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hakim, Simon; Weinblatt, J. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1993
Whether consensus existed among groups involved in implementing the Federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973 was examined through the Delphi technique for legislators, policymakers, directors of rehabilitation centers, and client training staffs. Different perceptions of objectives are highlighted, and the usefulness of the Delphi technique is…
Descriptors: Administrators, Comparative Analysis, Cooperative Planning, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Anderson, Richard W., Jr.; Coons, Maggie – New Directions for Higher Education, 1979
Accessibility requires consideration of the needs of various building occupants, and necessitates matching places to people, instead of requiring people to overcome barriers. Cost effective approaches to making campus facilities accessible, including mobility needs surveys and the utilization of handicapped consumers, are discussed. (Author/JMD)
Descriptors: Access to Education, Architectural Barriers, Campus Planning, Cost Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guthrie, R. Claire – New Directions for Higher Education, 1979
Answers to questions about institutional obligations under Sections 503 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 illustrate the legal issues that may confront college administrators as they make efforts to comply. Topics include: institutions that are covered, individuals who are protected, reasonable accommodation, affirmative action, and legal…
Descriptors: Administrative Problems, Affirmative Action, Compliance (Legal), Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Allbery, Charles Fred, III; Gressel, Michele – University of Dayton Law Review, 1978
Three federal acts--the Architectural Barriers Act, the Urban Mass Transportation Assistance Act, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973--are the focus of this examination of federal efforts to remove physical barriers. Requirements, application, and remedies of the federal legislation and how each act relates to the others are considered. (AF)
Descriptors: Architectural Barriers, Court Doctrine, Court Litigation, Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Turney, Harriet L. – University of Dayton Law Review, 1978
Numerous interpretation problems currently exist in the statutory and regulatory definition of "handicapped individual." The three-part definition as set forth in section 504 of the 1974 amendments is analyzed, and potential sources of controversy are identified in each section. Possible applications of such a broad definition are…
Descriptors: Definitions, Disabilities, Disability Discrimination, Discriminatory Legislation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jastram, Philip S. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1979
College faculty can learn to deal with common questions concerning disabled students, such as how much special assistance to offer them, and what special accommodations must be made to their particular limitations. Program requirements should be reviewed in order to distinguish what is essential. (Author/JMD)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Access to Education, Architectural Barriers, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pinder, Peggy – New Directions for Higher Education, 1979
The responsibilities of colleges and universities toward handicapped students under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 are matched by the responsibilities of disabled persons themselves toward their institution. Advanced planning by both colleges and students and an end to arrangements that segregate the handicapped are advocated.…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Architectural Barriers, Civil Rights, College Environment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bailey, Cornelia W. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1979
Federal regulations regarding the handicapped pose problems for recipients of federal aid, but higher education's reactions have been more positive than negative. The principle problems seem to be compliance costs, the need for interpretation of the regulations, and difficulties in the areas of admissions and academic requirements. (Author/JMD)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Access to Education, Administrative Problems, Admission Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
O'Donnell, Garry W. – University of Dayton Law Review, 1978
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination by any recipient of federal assistance on the basis of a person's handicap. Discussion centers on claiming protection under Section 504, a court case illustrating affirmative duty, and private right of action and standards for scrutinizing unequal treatment. (AF)
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Court Doctrine, Court Litigation, Disability Discrimination
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hanson, Gail Short – New Directions for Higher Education, 1979
Federal regulations regarding access to higher education for the handicapped are considered in the absence of definitive guidance from the government. Topics include: physical accessibility, recruitment activities, admissions tests, financial aid, off-campus housing, and student health insurance. (Author/JMD)
Descriptors: Access to Education, Administrative Problems, Admission Criteria, Architectural Barriers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barber, Catherine Miller – University of Dayton Law Review, 1978
Section 504's prohibiting discrimination solely on the basis of handicap against otherwise qualified individuals in programs receiving federal funds was the basis of a deaf student's claim that an institution's failure to provide an interpreter violated Section 504. Implications for private colleges and possible grounds for appeal are discussed.…
Descriptors: Court Doctrine, Court Litigation, Deaf Interpreting, Deafness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brooks, Gary Thomas – Mercer Law Review, 1978
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 was the basis for a deaf student's successful suit against a private college for failure to provide funds for an interpreter. Implications for private colleges and an argument for the unconstitutionality of the law as applied to private postsecondary institutions are discussed. (AF)
Descriptors: Access to Education, Constitutional Law, Court Doctrine, Court Litigation