Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Orthographic Symbols | 4 |
Visual Discrimination | 4 |
Alphabets | 2 |
Decoding (Reading) | 2 |
Letters (Alphabet) | 2 |
Phoneme Grapheme… | 2 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Attention | 1 |
Character Recognition | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Contrastive Linguistics | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Kindergarten | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Brazil | 1 |
Israel | 1 |
Michigan (Detroit) | 1 |
South Korea | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kim, Young-Suk Grace; Petscher, Yaacov; Treiman, Rebecca; Kelcey, Benjamin – Scientific Studies of Reading, 2021
To expand our understanding of script-general and script-specific principles in the learning of letter names, we examined how three characteristics of alphabet letters -- their frequency in printed materials, order in the alphabet, and visual similarity to other letters -- relate to children's letter-name knowledge in four languages with three…
Descriptors: Alphabets, Orthographic Symbols, Written Language, Printed Materials
Ziegler, Johannes C.; Pech-Georgel, Catherine; Dufau, Stephane; Grainger, Jonathan – Developmental Science, 2010
Visual-attentional theories of dyslexia predict deficits for dyslexic children not only for the perception of letter strings but also for non-alphanumeric symbol strings. This prediction was tested in a two-alternative forced-choice paradigm with letters, digits, and symbols. Children with dyslexia showed significant deficits for letter and digit…
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Phonological Awareness, Decoding (Reading), Phoneme Grapheme Correspondence

Knafle, June D.; Legenza, Alice – American Educational Research Journal, 1978
Results varied as a function of : (1) type of task (transfer, paired associate, or visual discrimination); (2) student age (kindergarten, first grade, or college); (3) stimuli size; and (4) number of response indicators. Research findings cannot be generalized from artificial orthographies to the English alphabet or from various aged subjects to…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Higher Education, Letters (Alphabet), Orthographic Symbols

Muraishi, Shozo – 1976
The Language Play Method (LPM), a teaching method developed to systematically instruct preschool children in the structure of Japanese and Hiragana letters, is described in this paper. LPM develops three fundamental abilities which contribute to oral skill and literacy in kindergartners: the ability to recognize letters, the ability to decode…
Descriptors: Character Recognition, Decoding (Reading), Educational Games, Elementary Education