Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 19 |
Descriptor
Paired Associate Learning | 25 |
Recall (Psychology) | 18 |
Memory | 14 |
Cues | 8 |
Testing | 7 |
Undergraduate Students | 7 |
Recognition (Psychology) | 6 |
Cognitive Processes | 5 |
College Students | 5 |
Experiments | 5 |
Metacognition | 5 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 25 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 25 |
Reports - Research | 22 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 11 |
Postsecondary Education | 9 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Need for Cognition Scale | 1 |
Raven Progressive Matrices | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Caitlin A. Sisk; Vanessa G. Lee – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2024
Throughout prolonged tasks, visual attention fluctuates temporally in response to the present stimuli, task demands, and changes in available attentional resources. This temporal fluctuation has downstream effects on memory for stimuli presented during the task. Researchers have established that detection of a target (e.g., a square of a color to…
Descriptors: Adults, Memory, Interference (Learning), Recall (Psychology)
Schaper, Marie Luisa; Bayen, Ute J.; Hey, Carolin V. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2022
In schema-based source monitoring, people mistakenly predict better source memory for expected sources (e.g., oven in the kitchen; "expectancy effect"), whereas actual source memory is better for unexpected sources (e.g., hairdryer in the kitchen; "inconsistency effect"; Schaper et al., 2019b). In three source-monitoring…
Descriptors: Schemata (Cognition), Metacognition, Memory, Expectation
Yim, Hyungwook; Dennis, Simon J.; Sloutsky, Vladimir M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2021
Models of statistical learning do not place constraints on the complexity of the memory structure that is formed during statistical learning, while empirical studies using the statistical learning task have only examined the formation of simple memory structures (e.g., two-way binding). On the contrary, the memory literature, using explicit memory…
Descriptors: Incidental Learning, Barriers, Memory, Difficulty Level
Bellezza, Francis S.; Elek, Jennifer K. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2019
Three source-monitoring models were tested using the data of Bellezza, Elek, and Zhang (2016), who presented word pairs with each word in 1 of 4 locations. Given 1 word as a cue, participants had to remember the other word as well as the 2 corresponding locations. Results included (a) locations of the cue and target words were identified equally…
Descriptors: Paired Associate Learning, Models, Cues, Identification
Campbell, Karen L.; Trelle, Alexandra; Hasher, Lynn – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
Older adults show hyper- (or excessive) binding effects for simultaneously and sequentially presented distraction. Here, we addressed the potential role of hyper-binding in paired-associate learning. Older and younger adults learned a list of word pairs and then received an associative recognition task in which rearranged pairs were formed from…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Paired Associate Learning, Time, Older Adults
Huff, Mark J.; Balota, David A.; Hutchison, Keith A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
We examined whether 2 types of interpolated tasks (i.e., retrieval-practice via free recall or guessing a missing critical item) improved final recognition for related and unrelated word lists relative to restudying or completing a filler task. Both retrieval-practice and guessing tasks improved correct recognition relative to restudy and filler…
Descriptors: Testing, Guessing (Tests), Memory, Retention (Psychology)
Davis, Sara D.; Chan, Jason C. K. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
Retrieving studied materials often enhances subsequent learning of new materials (Pastötter & Bäuml, 2014). However, retrieval has also been shown to impair new learning (Finn & Roediger, 2013). In this article, we attempted to determine when retrieval enhances and when it impairs new learning. We argue that testing impairs new learning…
Descriptors: Recall (Psychology), Information Retrieval, Testing, Testing Problems
Peterson, Daniel J.; Mulligan, Neil W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
One of the foundational principles of human memory is that repetition (i.e., being presented with a stimulus multiple times) improves recall. In the current study a group of participants who studied a list of cue-target pairs twice recalled fewer targets than a group who studied the pairs only once, a negative repetition effect. Such a…
Descriptors: Memory, Testing, Repetition, Stimuli
Arnold, Kathleen M.; McDermott, Kathleen B. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
The facilitative effect of retrieval practice, or testing, on the probability of later retrieval has been the focus of much recent empirical research. A lesser known benefit of retrieval practice is that it may also enhance the ability of a learner to benefit from a subsequent restudy opportunity. This facilitative effect of retrieval practice on…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Testing, Experiments, Memory
Mulligan, Neil W.; Peterson, Daniel J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
A fundamental property of human memory is that repetition enhances memory. Peterson and Mulligan (2012) recently documented a surprising "negative repetition effect," in which participants who studied a list of cue-target pairs twice recalled fewer targets than a group who studied the pairs only once. Words within a pair rhymed, and…
Descriptors: Memory, Repetition, Paired Associate Learning, Word Lists
Ariel, Robert – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
Learners typically allocate more resources to learning items that are higher in value than they do to items lower in value. For instance, when items vary in point value for learning, participants allocate more study time to the higher point items than they do to the lower point items. The current experiments extend this research to a context where…
Descriptors: Time Management, Experience, Study, Paired Associate Learning
Caplan, Jeremy B.; Boulton, Kathy L.; Gagné, Christina L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
Early verbal-memory researchers assumed participants represent memory of a pair of unrelated items with 2 independent, separately modifiable, directional associations. However, memory for pairs of unrelated words (A-B) exhibits associative symmetry: a near-perfect correlation between accuracy on forward (A??) and backward (??B) cued recall. This…
Descriptors: Paired Associate Learning, Cues, Recall (Psychology), Morphology (Languages)
Potts, Rosalind; Shanks, David R. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
Testing typically enhances subsequent recall of tested material. In contrast, it has been proposed that consolidated memories can be destabilized when reactivated and then need to be reconsolidated in order to persist. Learning new material immediately after reactivation may disrupt reconsolidation. We investigated whether the well-known benefits…
Descriptors: Memory, Testing, Recall (Psychology), Paired Associate Learning
Do Students Think That Difficult or Valuable Materials Should Be Restudied Sooner Rather than Later?
Cohen, Michael S.; Yan, Veronica X.; Halamish, Vered; Bjork, Robert A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
Despite the clear long-term benefits of spaced practice, students and teachers often choose massed practice. Whether learners actually fail to appreciate the benefits of spacing is, however, open to question. Early studies (e.g., Zechmeister & Shaughnessy, 1980) found that participants' judgments of learning were higher after massed than after…
Descriptors: Study Habits, Intervals, Time Management, Time Factors (Learning)
Creel, Sarah C.; Dahan, Delphine – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
In a series of experiments, participants learned to associate black-and-white shapes with nonsense spoken labels (e.g., "joop"). When tested on their recognition memory, participants falsely recognized as correct a shape paired with a label that began with the same sounds as the shape's original label (onset-overlapping lure; e.g., "joob") more…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Paired Associate Learning, Recognition (Psychology), Oral Language
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2