Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Aphasia | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Naming | 2 |
| Pantomime | 2 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Comprehension | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Experimental Groups | 1 |
| Neurological Impairments | 1 |
| Nonverbal Communication | 1 |
| Semantics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Krahmer, Emiel | 2 |
| Mol, Lisette | 2 |
| van Nispen, Karin | 2 |
| van de Sandt-Koenderman, Mieke | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkvan Nispen, Karin; van de Sandt-Koenderman, Mieke; Mol, Lisette; Krahmer, Emiel – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2016
Purpose: The present article aimed to inform clinical practice on whether people with aphasia (PWA) deploy pantomime techniques similarly to participants without brain damage (PWBD) and if not, what factors influence these differences. Method: We compared 38 PWA to 20 PWBD in their use of 6 representation techniques ("handling,"…
Descriptors: Pantomime, Aphasia, Neurological Impairments, Comparative Analysis
van Nispen, Karin; van de Sandt-Koenderman, Mieke; Mol, Lisette; Krahmer, Emiel – International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 2014
Background: Gesticulation (gestures accompanying speech) and pantomime (gestures in the absence of speech) can each be comprehensible. Little is known about the differences between these two gesture modes in people with aphasia. Aims: To discover whether there are differences in the communicative use of gesticulation and pantomime in QH, a person…
Descriptors: Aphasia, Pantomime, Nonverbal Communication, Case Studies
