Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Chinese | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Differences | 1 |
| Language Tests | 1 |
| Paper and Pencil Tests | 1 |
| Public Colleges | 1 |
| Second Language Learning | 1 |
| Undergraduate Students | 1 |
| Writing Achievement | 1 |
| Writing Tests | 1 |
Source
| Language Learning & Technology | 1 |
Author
| Matthew D. Coss | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMatthew D. Coss – Language Learning & Technology, 2025
The extent to which writing modality (i.e., hand-writing vs. keyboarding) impacts second-language (L2) writing assessment scores remains unclear. For alphabetic languages like English, research shows mixed results, documenting both equivalent and divergent scores between typed and handwritten tests (e.g., Barkaoui & Knouzi, 2018). However, for…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Paper and Pencil Tests, Second Language Learning, Chinese
