Publication Date
| In 2025 | 2 |
| Since 2024 | 2 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Differences | 2 |
| Paper and Pencil Tests | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| Chinese | 1 |
| College Bound Students | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Language Tests | 1 |
| Multiple Literacies | 1 |
| Numeracy | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Matthew D. Coss | 1 |
| Robert N. Prince | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| South Africa | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textRobert N. Prince – Numeracy, 2025
One of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic was the rapid shift to replacing traditional, paper-based tests with their computer-based counterparts. In many cases, these new modes of delivering tests will remain in place for the foreseeable future. In South Africa, the National Benchmark Quantitative Literacy (QL) test was impelled to make this…
Descriptors: Benchmarking, Numeracy, Multiple Literacies, Paper and Pencil Tests
Direct linkMatthew D. Coss – Language Learning & Technology, 2025
The extent to which writing modality (i.e., hand-writing vs. keyboarding) impacts second-language (L2) writing assessment scores remains unclear. For alphabetic languages like English, research shows mixed results, documenting both equivalent and divergent scores between typed and handwritten tests (e.g., Barkaoui & Knouzi, 2018). However, for…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Paper and Pencil Tests, Second Language Learning, Chinese
