Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Language Tests | 2 |
| Paper and Pencil Tests | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Chinese | 1 |
| College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Differences | 1 |
| English | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grade 12 | 1 |
| Home Schooling | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Matthew D. Coss | 1 |
| Salma A. Daiban | 1 |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| Grade 12 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United Arab Emirates | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMatthew D. Coss – Language Learning & Technology, 2025
The extent to which writing modality (i.e., hand-writing vs. keyboarding) impacts second-language (L2) writing assessment scores remains unclear. For alphabetic languages like English, research shows mixed results, documenting both equivalent and divergent scores between typed and handwritten tests (e.g., Barkaoui & Knouzi, 2018). However, for…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Paper and Pencil Tests, Second Language Learning, Chinese
Salma A. Daiban – ProQuest LLC, 2009
The CEPA-English test is used for achievement, selection, and placement purposes. Since this test has heavily influences student's academic futures, it is imperative to ensure that the test functions as intended and provides meaningful results. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the technical quality of the CEPA-English test in…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Language Tests, English, Language Proficiency
