NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1996
The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling in a Massachusetts case involving an AIDS awareness program. Disagrees with ruling that the defendants had not violated the plaintiffs' federal rights and contends that parents should have the right to remove their children from a one-time performance that is not part of a…
Descriptors: Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, Court Litigation, Federal Courts, High Schools
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1985
Two court cases involving parental objections to a school's curriculum on religious grounds carry important implications for the balance of control school boards and parents exert over the public school curriculum. (TE)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Curriculum Problems, Elementary Secondary Education, Parent Rights
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1996
Discusses clear trends in school law regarding compulsory community service and school district liability for student-to-student sexual harassment. The courts are upholding mandatory community service programs, as seen in a recent Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling. The courts are also recognizing a student's right to protection by school…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Legal Responsibility, Parent Rights
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1996
The Federal District Court ruled in favor of the Chapel Hill, North Carolina, school board's requirement that, as a condition for graduation, each student must perform 50 hours of unpaid community service. (MLF)
Descriptors: Community Services, Court Litigation, Federal Courts, Graduation Requirements
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1987
Discusses the debate over proper balance between a school board's authority to prescribe a uniform curriculum and parent's First Amendment right to free exercise of religion, citing a recent Tennessee case which determined that uniform use of objectionable texts is not crucial for a sound education. (WTH)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Course Selection (Students), Court Litigation, Curriculum Problems