NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mead, Julie F.; Lewis, Maria M. – American Educational Research Journal, 2016
This study explores four instances where parental choice has been employed as a legal "circuit breaker": (a) First Amendment Establishment Clause cases related to public funding, (b) Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection cases regarding race-conscious student assignment, (c) Title IX regulations concerning single-sex education, and (d) a…
Descriptors: Parents, Legal Responsibility, Federal Legislation, Parent Rights
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Sedler, Robert A. – Forum on Public Policy Online, 2007
Blackstone's Commentaries stated that the common law imposed a duty on parents to provide for the maintenance, protection, and education of their children, and of these, the duty to provide an education was "of far the greatest importance." Early on American courts cited Blackstone for the proposition of the common law duty of parents…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Laws, Parent Rights, Parent Responsibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bender, Denise G. – Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2004
Currently, the decision concerning pediatric cochlear implantation for children remains a personal choice for parents to make. Economic factors, educational outcomes, and societal attitudes concerning deafness could result in an increased governmental interest in this choice. This article examines case law related to the issue of parental autonomy…
Descriptors: Deafness, Assistive Technology, Federal Legislation, Parent Rights
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bloom, Ira – Journal of Law & Education, 2003
Discusses changing framework of American education in light of charter-school movement, school choice and voucher programs, and home schooling. Analyzes potential impact on public education of 2000 Supreme Court decision ("Troxel v. Granville"), involving parents' child visitation rights. Concludes that "Troxel" could…
Descriptors: Charter Schools, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Educational Vouchers
Zirkel, Perry A. – Phi Delta Kappan, 2005
This analysis of a November 2001 case in Botetourt County, Virginia, looks at whether the Fourth Amendment right against an unreasonable "seizure" or the 14th Amendment "liberty" for parents to control the care and custody of their children requires a ban on, or at least immediate notification regarding, detentions of a…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Constitutional Law, Student Rights, Parent Rights
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stenger, Robert L. – Journal of Law and Education, 1986
Outlines important considerations in maintaining legal relationships between the school, pupils, and third parties (including parents). Defines "child" and "parent." Discusses the impact on school personnel of the complex variety of persons and institutions that may claim rights and privileges as "parent" with regard…
Descriptors: Academic Records, Child Custody, Divorce, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wendel, Josef; And Others – School Law Bulletin, 1986
Parental rights and state compulsory school attendance requirements are limited by constitutional constraints, as shown in three benchmark cases. The article also cites cases to show the impact of compulsory education laws on home schooling, which is increasing. The state retains the power to impose minimum curriculum requirements. Cites…
Descriptors: Compulsory Education, Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Government School Relationship
Howard, J. Paul R. – Education Canada, 2001
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a state law compelling a child's attendance at a public school constitutes a violation of the parent's liberty interest under the 14th amendment. In Canada, however, courts have held that their equivalent to the 14th amendment does not encompass the liberty of parents to choose how to educate their children.…
Descriptors: Compulsory Education, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education
Zirkel, Perry A. – Phi Delta Kappan, 2000
Regarding Catholic parents' suit against a suburban New York district for promoting occult activities, a federal court ruled in May 1999 that parents had failed to prove existence of the so- called Bedford program. This Solomon-like ruling also rejected First Amendment religious claims and 14th Amendment privacy claims. (MLH)
Descriptors: Catholics, Controversial Issues (Course Content), Court Litigation, Elementary Education