NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jurik, Nancy C. – Small Group Behavior, 1987
Examined techniques of persuasion used in self-help organization for persons with mental problems. Concludes that successful affiliation with the group is a conversion process and that, although acceptance of the organizational ideology may facilitate an individual member's recovery, it simultaneously reinforces an understanding of mental problems…
Descriptors: Change Strategies, Group Dynamics, Mental Disorders, Participant Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCorcle, Mitchell D. – Small Group Behavior, 1982
Tested several hypotheses relating to a theory incorporating distinctive characteristics of interdisciplinary task groups. Observed an interdisciplinary task team for 28 weekly meetings. Recorded seating and major interactions of participants. Presents guidelines for the conduct of interdisciplinary groups. (RC)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Group Dynamics, Group Membership, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kipper, David A.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1981
Investigated the influence on group formation of feedback provided by potential members. Results indicated choices students made varied according to the pertinence of the feedback to the characteristics of the problem. Suggests a sociometric choice in the form of attraction to the feedback provider could indicate the existence of such pertinence.…
Descriptors: Congruence (Psychology), Feedback, Group Membership, Interpersonal Attraction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Koffmann, Andrew; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1978
The relationship between social skills and group psychotherapy is assessed. No evidence is found that high or low socially skilled subjects differ in verbal behavior in analogue groups. No evidence was found correlating overall adjustment and group participation. (MFD)
Descriptors: Adjustment (to Environment), Group Dynamics, Higher Education, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Berger, Stephen E.; Anchor, Kenneth N. – Small Group Behavior, 1978
People who have less prior knowledge of others in a group give more personal information. In dyads low-prior knowers give and receive more personal statements than high-prior knowers. Therapists can support confiding personal information about his/her self. (MFD)
Descriptors: Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Helping Relationship, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bradley, Patricia Hayes – Small Group Behavior, 1978
This study suggests female and male verbal behavior should be viewed separately when analysing task-importance. Ego-involvement works with task importance to create atmospheres of maximum involvement. Characteristics of communication and group pressure for uniformity are identified. (MFD)
Descriptors: Conformity, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Piper, William E.; Marrache, Myriam – Small Group Behavior, 1981
Investigated the relationship between behavior variables and pretherapy variables and found significant positive relationships. The amount of work a patient produced in a therapy group was highly related to pretraining levels of on-task behavior. Psychiatric interview variables were poor predictors of pretraining behaviors. (JAC)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Counseling Techniques, Counselor Client Relationship, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Palisi, Anthony T.; Ruzicka, Mary F. – Small Group Behavior, 1981
Describes Cattell's model as inclusive of the work of family therapists of all orientations. The model defines groups as having interrelated aspects, and all variables related to group phenomena as fitting into three panels: population traits, characteristics of internal structure, and syntality traits. Suggests model gives uniformity to field.…
Descriptors: Change Strategies, Counseling Theories, Family (Sociological Unit), Family Counseling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dies, Robert R. – Small Group Behavior, 1978
This research evaluates why individuals seek out or avoid encounter groups. The most important reasons for participation include; self-understanding, overcoming specific problems and learning to express feelings. Reluctance may come from lack of trust and fear of losing control. (MFD)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Emotional Response, Feedback, Group Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zimpfer, David; Waltman, Douglas – Small Group Behavior, 1982
Used multiple groups (N=9) and multiple counselors (N=9) to study correlates of effectiveness in group counseling. Results indicated that both counselor and group composition variables related significantly to member interaction, to how much they valued the group, and to changes in member self-images. (RC)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Counseling Effectiveness, Counseling Techniques, Counselor Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Baker, Paul M. – Small Group Behavior, 1988
Studied effects of factors on group discussion participation, observing 218 subjects in four-, five-, or six-person mock juries discussing mandatory retirement case. Visibility and size were main predictors of who spoke first; first-to-speak, age, and sex were predictors of participation in first minute. Total participation was affected by age,…
Descriptors: Age Differences, College Students, Foreign Countries, Group Discussion