Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 10 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 17 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 20 |
Descriptor
Participation | 20 |
Ethics | 17 |
Informed Consent | 10 |
Research Methodology | 9 |
Foreign Countries | 6 |
Research | 6 |
Medical Research | 5 |
Barriers | 4 |
Decision Making | 3 |
Patients | 3 |
Qualitative Research | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Research Ethics | 20 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 20 |
Reports - Research | 10 |
Reports - Evaluative | 9 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Cameroon | 1 |
Canada | 1 |
Canada (Toronto) | 1 |
Ireland | 1 |
New Zealand | 1 |
Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh) | 1 |
Switzerland | 1 |
Uganda | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bélisle-Pipon, Jean-Christophe; Couture, Vincent; Roy, Marie-Christine – Research Ethics, 2022
Engaging citizens and patients in research has become a truism in many fields of health research. It is now seen as a laudable--if not compulsory--activity in research for yielding more impactful and meaningful citizen/patient outcomes and steering research in the right direction. Although this research approach is increasingly common and…
Descriptors: Patients, Participation, Research, Ethics
Hugh Davies; Simon E. Kolstoe; Anthony Lockett – Research Ethics, 2024
Valid consent requires the potential research participant understands the information provided. We examined current practice in 50 proposed Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products to determine how this understanding is checked. The majority of the proposals (n = 44) indicated confirmation of understanding would take place during an…
Descriptors: Participation, Research Problems, Informed Consent, Comprehension
Sylvia Nabukenya; David Kyaddondo; Adelline Twimukye; Ian Guyton Munabi; Catriona Waitt; Erisa S Mwaka – Research Ethics, 2024
This study aimed to explore stakeholders' perspectives on the ethical considerations for returning individual pharmacogenomics research results to people living with HIV. A qualitative approach to investigation involved five focus group discussions with 30 Community representatives, 12 key informant interviews with researchers, and 12 in-depth…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), Pharmacology, Genetics
Davies, Hugh; Munday, Rosie; O'Reilly, Maeve; Hamilton, Catriona Gilmour; Ardahan, Arzhang; Kolstoe, Simon E.; Gillies, Katie – Research Ethics, 2023
Research consent processes must provide potential participants with the necessary information to help them decide if they wish to join a study. On the Oxford 'A' Research Ethics Committee we've found that current research proposals mostly provide adequate detail (even if not in an easily comprehensible format), but often fail to support decision…
Descriptors: Research, Informed Consent, Participation, Decision Making
Aurini, Janice; Iafolla, Vanessa – Research Ethics, 2023
We draw on three illustrative vignettes to examine how REBs manage participants' agency in the context of qualitative research. We ask: Who owns a participant's consent? Central to informed consent is the principle of "Respect for Persons," which privileges the autonomy of individuals to make decisions about what happens (or not) to…
Descriptors: Research, Ethics, Qualitative Research, Participation
Zur, Rebecca L. – Research Ethics, 2023
Pregnancy is a frequently applied exclusion criteria for many forms of research. Common justifications for this exclusion include the potential for teratogenicity, as well as the potential for physiologic changes in pregnancy to impact the research itself. The systematic exclusion of pregnant persons from clinical studies has created a significant…
Descriptors: Experimental Groups, Control Groups, Research Methodology, Pregnancy
Kislovskiy, Yasaswi; Chappell, Catherine; Flaherty, Emily; Hamm, Megan E.; de Abril Cameron, Flor; Krans, Elizabeth; Chang, Judy C. – Research Ethics, 2022
Limited research has been done among pregnant people participating in investigational drug trials. To enhance the ethical understanding of pregnant people's perspectives on research participation, we sought to describe motives and risk perceptions of participants in a phase 1 trial of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) treatment for chronic Hepatitis…
Descriptors: Communicable Diseases, Pregnancy, Drug Therapy, Participation
Anderson, Emily E.; Hurley, Elisa A.; Serpico, Kimberley; Johnson, Ann; Rowe, Jessica; Singleton, Megan; Bierer, Barbara E.; Cholka, Brooke; Chaudhari, Swapnali; Fernandez Lynch, Holly – Research Ethics, 2023
The primary purpose of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) is to protect the rights and welfare of human research participants. Evaluation and measurement of how IRBs satisfy this purpose and other important goals are open questions that demand empirical research. Research on IRBs, and the Human Research Protection Programs (HRPPs) of which they…
Descriptors: Research, Ethics, Stakeholders, Barriers
Rost, Michael; Nast, Rebecca; Elger, Bernice S.; Shaw, David – Research Ethics, 2021
This paper addresses psychological factors that might interfere with informed consent on the part of stable patients as potential early-phase clinical trial participants. Thirty-six semistructured interviews with patients who had either diabetes or gout were conducted. We investigated stable patients' attitudes towards participating in a…
Descriptors: Patients, Medical Research, Informed Consent, Psychological Patterns
Sankary, Lauren R.; Zelinsky, Megan E.; Ford, Paul J.; Blackstone, Eric C.; Fox, Robert J. – Research Ethics, 2023
The ethical recruitment of participants with neurological disorders in clinical research requires obtaining initial and ongoing informed consent. The purpose of this study is to characterize barriers faced by research personnel in obtaining informed consent from research participants with neurological disorders and to identify strategies applied…
Descriptors: Informed Consent, Medical Research, Neurological Impairments, Barriers
Tauri, Juan M. – Research Ethics, 2018
Recently, Indigenous commentators have begun to analyse the way in which institutional Research Ethics Boards (REBs) engage with Indigenous researchers and participants, respond to Indigenous peoples' concerns with academic research activities, and scrutinise the ethics proposals of Indigenous scholars. Of particular concern for Indigenous…
Descriptors: Indigenous Populations, Researchers, Ethics, Informed Consent
Christofides, Emily; Stroud, Karla; Tullis, Diana Elizabeth; O'Doherty, Kieran C. – Research Ethics, 2019
The practice of communicating research findings to participants has been identified as important in the research ethics literature, but little research has examined empirically how this occurs and what research participants' views are in this regard. We interviewed 21 adults with cystic fibrosis who had previously participated in research and 2…
Descriptors: Genetic Disorders, Medical Research, Information Dissemination, Ethics
Vuban, Joyce Afuh; Eta, Elizabeth Agbor – Research Ethics, 2019
This article argues that localizing access -- a general ethical principle -- is a workable strategy that can be used in approaching participants in qualitative research across disciplines and in coping with respective institutional practices in order to collect meaningful data. This article is based on the autobiographical, lived experiences of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Qualitative Research, Data Collection, Field Studies
Vellinga, Akke; Devine, Colum; Ho, Min Yun; Clarke, Colin; Leahy, Patrick; Bourke, Jane; Devane, Declan; Duane, Sinead; Kearney, Patricia – Research Ethics, 2020
Incentivising has shown to improve participation in clinical trials. However, ethical concerns suggest that incentives may be coercive, obscure trial risks and encourage individuals to enrol in clinical trials for the wrong reasons. The aim of our study was to develop and pilot a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to explore and identify preferences…
Descriptors: Patients, Value Judgment, Incentives, Randomized Controlled Trials
Zutlevics, T. L. – Research Ethics, 2016
Controversy over providing financial incentives to research participants has a long history and remains an issue of contention in both current discussions about research ethics and for institutional review bodies/human research ethics committees which are charged with the responsibility of deciding whether such incentives fall within ethical…
Descriptors: Incentives, Research Methodology, Ethics, Participation
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2