Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Difficulty Level | 5 |
Pass Fail Grading | 5 |
Decision Making | 3 |
Standard Setting (Scoring) | 3 |
Test Items | 3 |
Cutting Scores | 2 |
Standards | 2 |
Ability | 1 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Anatomy | 1 |
Biology | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Faggen, Jane | 1 |
Forgey, Staci B. | 1 |
Jones, Phil | 1 |
Norcini, John | 1 |
Pribesh, Shana | 1 |
Schnipke, Deborah L. | 1 |
Shulruf, Boaz | 1 |
Turner, Rolf | 1 |
Williams, Mitchell R. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
Location
Virginia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Forgey, Staci B.; Williams, Mitchell R.; Pribesh, Shana – Community College Enterprise, 2020
Gatekeeper courses such as Anatomy and Physiology are often referenced in discussions regarding the national shortage of persons in allied health professions. In an attempt to bolster access to STEM professions, some community colleges are mandating prerequisite courses such as Natural Sciences and/or General Biology for STEM gatekeeping courses.…
Descriptors: Anatomy, Physiology, Community Colleges, Prerequisites
Shulruf, Boaz; Jones, Phil; Turner, Rolf – Higher Education Studies, 2015
The determination of Pass/Fail decisions over Borderline grades, (i.e., grades which do not clearly distinguish between the competent and incompetent examinees) has been an ongoing challenge for academic institutions. This study utilises the Objective Borderline Method (OBM) to determine examinee ability and item difficulty, and from that…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Pass Fail Grading, Decision Making, Probability
Schnipke, Deborah L. – 2002
A common practice in some certification fields (e.g., information technology) is to draw items from an item pool randomly and apply a common passing score, regardless of the items administered. Because these tests are commonly used, it is important to determine how accurate the pass/fail decisions are for such tests and whether fairly small,…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Difficulty Level, Item Banks, Pass Fail Grading

Faggen, Jane; And Others – 1995
The objective of this study was to determine the degree to which recommendations for passing scores, calculated on the basis of a traditional standard-setting methodology, might be affected by the mode (paper versus computer-screen prints) in which test items were presented to standard setting panelists. Results were based on the judgments of 31…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Cutting Scores, Difficulty Level, Evaluators

Norcini, John; And Others – Applied Measurement in Education, 1994
Whether anchor item sets varying in difficulty and discrimination affect precision of cutting score equivalents generated through judge rescaling as much as equivalents from score equating was studied with 4 groups of experts and 250 and 1,000 examinees. Results indicate the robustness of judge rescaling and its superiority over equating. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Decision Making, Difficulty Level, Equated Scores