NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 76 to 90 of 349 results Save | Export
Pascal, C. E.; Geis, G. L. – Learning and Development, 1974
Comments and points representing "lore" rather than proven facts are presented in this outline to summarize some of the issues raised by critics and proponents of various methods of grading rather than presenting a summary of research. Pro and con arguments are those typically advanced by proponents or detractors and are not presented as facts.…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Pass Fail Grading
Frankel, Edward – 1973
The Honors-Pass-Fail (H-P-F) grading system was introduced experimentally in the fall 1971 semester to replace the traditional A-B-C-F grading system in graduate courses in education at Herbert H. Lehman College. The purpose was to determine if H-P-F discriminated more sharply between exceptional and average student achievement than the…
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Grading, Pass Fail Grading, Student Attitudes
Delohery, Pat; McLaughlin, Gerald – 1971
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University implemented a pass-fail grading system two years ago. The procedure in use appears to be working smoothly and suffers little abuse. Aside from physical education, courses taught under this system primarily are taken by seniors. The number of courses elected for pass-fail grading is small: 3.3…
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Grading, Higher Education, Pass Fail Grading
Quann, Charles J. – 1971
This paper summarizes the author's research on the pass/fail grading system at Washington State University. Specifically, the paper presents (1) a discussion of the use of the pass/fail grading option at WSU and enrollment trends under this option first available in summer 1968 as a 3-year experiment; (2) an analysis of the questionnaire…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Enrollment Trends, Grading, Higher Education
1969
It is the recommendation of the Committee on Academic Progress of Students to the Faculty Council at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro that each undergraduate student may elect to be evaluated on a "Pass/Not Pass" scale in 1 course each semester, with a maximum of 8 courses being allowed for the degree. One semester courses are exempt…
Descriptors: College Credits, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Higher Education
Davidovicz, H. M. – 1972
This review presents a sample of the literature on pass-fail grading that was written between 1968 and 1971. The review leads to the following conclusions: (1) Students do not take pass-fail courses in order to avoid evaluation, but once having taken them their performance in both those courses and in traditionally graded courses declines; (2)…
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Higher Education, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Raschal, John – College Composition and Communication, 1976
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Marshall, Max S. – Contemporary Education, 1974
A sharp distinction is made between judgemental evaluation of a student and description of students' work and behavior. The author believes that a students' ranking will affect his relationship with the instructor and his performance. (HMD)
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Pass Fail Grading, Student Evaluation
Brown, Don W. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1972
Descriptors: Educational Research, Grading, Higher Education, Pass Fail Grading
Pascal, Charles E. – Educational Technology-Teacher and Technology Supplement, 1971
Descriptors: Grading, Higher Education, Pass Fail Grading, Programed Instruction
Stallings, William M.; Leslie, Elwood K. – Impr Coll Univ Teaching, 1970
Students prefer a pass-fail system to letter grading. (IR)
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Higher Education, Pass Fail Grading, Student Attitudes
Quann, Charles J. – 1970
In an attempt to isolate new trends and options in grading, 150 four-year colleges and universities were surveyed. Of these, 102 offered pass/fail or a similar grading option, 30 had no grading option, 6 indicated that a system was under serious consideration and 12 failed to respond. The two major reasons for haveing a pass/fail system were: (1)…
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Higher Education, Pass Fail Grading
Miller, Stuart – 1967
The following advantages are regularly cited for traditional grading: it is in common use and allows relatively standardized information about students; it enforces academic discipline; it serves numerous administrative purposes; it prepares students for the competitions of life; it motivates students; and it is a fairly reliable index of academic…
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Evaluation, Grades (Scholastic), Grading
Wang, LihShing; Pan, Wei; Austin, James T. – 2003
Standard-setting research has yielded a rich array of more than 50 standard-setting procedures, but practitioners are likely to be confused about which to use. By synthesizing the accumulated research on standard setting and progress monitoring, this study developed a three-dimensional taxonomy for conceptualizing and operationalizing the various…
Descriptors: Accountability, Cutting Scores, Educational Research, Pass Fail Grading
Fleming, Robben W. – Independent School Bulletin, 1973
Author, who is the President of the University of Michigan, discusses the principal change in the grading system in recent years - pass-fail grading. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Certification, Educational Development, Grading, Pass Fail Grading
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  24