Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 7 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Source
Assessment & Evaluation in… | 4 |
Higher Education: The… | 2 |
Studies in Higher Education | 2 |
European Journal of… | 1 |
Teaching in Higher Education | 1 |
Author
Boud, David | 10 |
Carless, David | 2 |
Sridharan, Bhavani | 2 |
Armstrong, Merilyn | 1 |
Broadbent, Jaclyn | 1 |
Cohen, Ruth | 1 |
Deneen, Christopher | 1 |
Hoo, Hui-Teng | 1 |
Ibarra-Sáiz, María Soledad | 1 |
Lodge, Jason M. | 1 |
Malecka, Bianka | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 10 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 6 |
Postsecondary Education | 5 |
Audience
Location
Singapore | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Malecka, Bianka; Boud, David; Carless, David – Teaching in Higher Education, 2022
Recent feedback literature suggests that the development of student feedback literacy has potential to address problems in current feedback practice. Students' feedback literacy involves developing the capacity to make the most of feedback opportunities by active involvement in feedback processes. How the development of student feedback literacy…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Multiple Literacies, Curriculum Development, Undergraduate Students
Hoo, Hui-Teng; Deneen, Christopher; Boud, David – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
Recent growth in research on feedback has focussed on the importance of developing student feedback literacy. That is, the capabilities students need to make good use of feedback processes. To date there have been few investigations of how ideas about student feedback literacy can be translated into course design. This paper therefore examines…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Feedback (Response), Journal Writing, Peer Evaluation
Ibarra-Sáiz, María Soledad; Rodríguez-Gómez, Gregorio; Boud, David – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 2020
How can students' competence be developed through peer assessment? This paper focuses on how relevant variables such as participation, evaluative judgement and the quality of the assessment interact and influence peer assessment. From an analysis of 4 years of data from undergraduate classes in project management, it develops a model of causal…
Descriptors: Competence, Student Development, Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Panadero, Ernesto; Broadbent, Jaclyn; Boud, David; Lodge, Jason M. – European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2019
Recently, the concept of evaluative judgement has gained attention as a pedagogical approach to classroom formative assessment practices. Evaluative judgement is the capacity to be able to judge the work of oneself and that of others, which implies developing knowledge about one's own assessment capability. A focus on evaluative judgement helps us…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Evaluative Thinking, Self Management, Models
Carless, David; Boud, David – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018
Student feedback literacy denotes the understandings, capacities and dispositions needed to make sense of information and use it to enhance work or learning strategies. In this conceptual paper, student responses to feedback are reviewed and a number of barriers to student uptake of feedback are discussed. Four inter-related features are proposed…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Information Literacy, Barriers, Peer Evaluation
Sridharan, Bhavani; Tai, Joanna; Boud, David – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 2019
The accuracy and consistency of peer marking, particularly when students have the power to reward (or penalise) during formative and summative assessment regimes, is largely unknown. The objective of this study is to evaluate students' ability and behaviour in marking their peers' teamwork performance in a collaborative group assessment context…
Descriptors: Summative Evaluation, Peer Evaluation, Cooperative Learning, Group Activities
Sridharan, Bhavani; Boud, David – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019
A crucial determinant of the success or failure of collaborative group work is the effect of peer feedback interventions on learning. Research exploring such effects on developing soft skills is sparse. This study seeks to address whether peer feedback leads to enhanced teamwork behaviour and self-assessment ability, two skills highly sought after…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Teamwork, Self Evaluation (Individuals)

Boud, David; Cohen, Ruth; Sampson, Jane – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1999
Examines assessment issues in connection with peer learning at the college level and suggests ways in which the benefits of this approach can be maintained while still meeting a course's formal assessment requirements. Discusses the use of group assessment, peer feedback, self-assessment, assessment of participation, and negotiated assessment. (DB)
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Evaluation Methods, Feedback, Higher Education

Armstrong, Merilyn; Boud, David – Studies in Higher Education, 1983
Assessment of class participation can be used effectively in student evaluation, but it should not become subjective, impressionistic, and unreliable. It provides an opportunity for peer and self-evaluation, but refinements in techniques and criteria are needed. (MSE)
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Discussion (Teaching Technique), Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods

Boud, David – Studies in Higher Education, 1990
Many current assessment practices are incompatible with the goals of independence, thoughtfulness and critical analysis; common forms of assessment are not consistent with the behavior of academics in their own contributions to knowledge; and the assessment policy of many departments undermines approaches to learning. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Competence, Educational Quality, Feedback