NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)11
Since 2006 (last 20 years)48
Assessments and Surveys
Systematic Screening for…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 406 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dinov, Ivo D. – Studies in Higher Education, 2020
The return on research investment resulting from new breakthrough scientific discoveries may be decreasing over time due to the law of diminishing returns, the relative decrease of research funding in terms of purchasing power parity, and various activities gaming the system. By altering the grant-review process, the scientific community may…
Descriptors: Grantsmanship, Bids, Peer Evaluation, Research Proposals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Sá, Maria José; Ferreira, Carlos Miguel; Santos, Ana Isabel; Serpa, Sandro – International Journal of Higher Education, 2020
At a time of great dynamism among publishers of scientific publications, with the inevitability of Open Access and the ease of publishing online at low cost, it is possible to find publications with different levels of scientific respectability. In this context, the improvement of the quality of scholarly publications emerges as a critical element…
Descriptors: Scholarship, Faculty Publishing, Scientific Research, Periodicals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kettler, Todd – Journal of Advanced Academics, 2019
The movement toward open-science is multifaceted with the general goal to promote both better scientific practices and greater access to scientific information. One aspect of the open-science framework is the recommended use of registered reports replacing the legacy model that dictates research manuscripts are submitted for initial review only…
Descriptors: Periodicals, Access to Information, Gifted, Special Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jackson, Liz; Peters, Michael A.; Benade, Leon; Devine, Nesta; Arndt, Sonja; Forster, Daniella; Gibbons, Andrew; Grierson, Elizabeth; Jandric, Petar; Lazaroiu, George; Locke, Kirsten; Mihaila, Ramona; Stewart, Georgina; Tesar, Marek; Roberts, Peter; Ozolinš, Janis – Open Review of Educational Research, 2018
Peer review is central to academic publishing. Yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious practice, which can cause distress for both reviewers, and those whose work is reviewed. This paper, produced by the Editors' Collective, examines the past and future of peer review in academic publishing. The first sections consider how peer review has…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Faculty Publishing, Editing, Scholarship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.; Al-Khatib, Aceil – Research Ethics, 2019
Without peer reviewers, the entire scholarly publishing system as we currently know it would collapse. However, as it currently stands, publishing is an extremely exploitative system, relative to other business models, in which trained and specialized labor is exploited, in the form of editors and peer reviewers, primarily by for-profit…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Faculty Publishing, Editing, Publishing Industry
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baccini, Alberto; De Nicolao, Giuseppe – Research Evaluation, 2017
This letter documents some problems in Ancaiani et al. (2015). Namely the evaluation of concordance, based on Cohen's kappa, reported by Ancaiani et al. was not computed on the whole random sample of 9,199 articles, but on a subset of 7,597 articles. The kappas relative to the whole random sample were in the range 0.07-0.15, indicating an…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Scientific Research, Evaluation, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Merry, Lisa; Jarvis, Kimberly; Kupoluyi, Joseph; Lual, Jomama One Jomama – Journal of Research Practice, 2017
There is very little written regarding developing the skills of doing peer reviews. In this piece we use our own experience as postdoctoral fellows to offer our reflections on how to get the most out of doing peer reviews as a trainee researcher. We touch upon the variety and complexity of peer reviews, the debates concerning the nature and…
Descriptors: Postdoctoral Education, Peer Evaluation, Reflection, Fellowships
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Beall, Jeffrey – New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 2017
This commentary examines the problem of predatory journals, low-quality open-access journals that seek to earn revenue from scholarly authors without following scholarly publishing best practices. Seeking to accept as many papers as possible, they typically do not perform a standard peer review, leading to the publication of improperly vetted…
Descriptors: Periodicals, Peer Evaluation, Educational Research, Educational Quality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Driscoll, Amy; Sandmann, Lorilee R. – Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 2016
In this commentary, authors Amy Driscoll and Lorilee R. Sandmann reflect on their 2001 "Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement" article, "From Maverick to Mainstream: The Scholarship of Engagement" reprinted in this 20th anniversary issue of "Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement." Fifteen…
Descriptors: Scholarship, School Community Relationship, Higher Education, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Teschers, Christoph – Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2017
Gert J. J. Biesta is a widely known and respected scholar in the field of education. He has published a large number of articles, books, chapters and other work. He is currently professor of Education in the Department of Education at Brunel University London. This interview with Biesta touched on a wide range of topics. This article is a…
Descriptors: Editing, Interviews, College Faculty, Educational Philosophy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Heraud, Richard; Tesar, Marek – Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2017
Professor Michael A. Peters has worked in an era of transformation that has taken him from a labour-intensive paper-based form of production to the computerised reproduction of thought, and the current shift in the publishing landscape from a reader-subscription to an author-pays model. Most of what he has learned in publishing and editing he has…
Descriptors: Interviews, Electronic Publishing, Publishing Industry, Authors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fischman, Mark G. – Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2014
Knudson, Morrow, and Thomas (2014) recently summarized a number of important issues related to the quality of peer review and current peer-review practice in kinesiology. This writer endorses their six recommendations for improving peer review in kinesiology journals. The purpose of this commentary is to further highlight the importance of…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Review (Reexamination), Movement Education, Journal Articles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Linhart, Jean Marie – PRIMUS, 2014
Writing and communication are essential skills for success in the workplace or in graduate school, yet writing and communication are often the last thing that instructors think about incorporating into a mathematics course. A mathematical modeling course provides a natural environment for writing assignments. This article is an analysis of the…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Mathematical Models, Mathematics Instruction, Writing Instruction
Radford, John – Psychology Teaching Review, 2012
In responding to Jim Hartley, with whom I very largely agree, I first reflect on my own experience of teaching Psychology in an institution which was successively college of technology, polytechnic and university. In the second a new and fruitful method of assessing higher education essentially by peer review was developed, only to be destroyed in…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Psychology, Teaching Methods, College Science
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maessen, K. M. H. – Higher Education Policy, 2012
The article entitled "The selection of scientific talent in the allocation of research grants" by van Arensbergen and van den Besselaar published in "Higher Education Policy" 25/3 (2012) is based on research that both researchers carried out on behalf of The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. In this comment, we…
Descriptors: Scientific Research, Grants, Resource Allocation, Interviews
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  28