Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Peer Evaluation | 3 |
Writing Evaluation | 3 |
College Students | 2 |
Essays | 2 |
Grades (Scholastic) | 2 |
Learning Processes | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Scoring Rubrics | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Computer Assisted… | 3 |
Author
Bermúdez, Manuel | 1 |
Bettis, E. A., III | 1 |
Cerezo, Rebeca | 1 |
García-Martínez, Carlos | 1 |
Gikonyo, J. | 1 |
Novakovich, J. | 1 |
Romero, Cristóbal | 1 |
Russell, J. | 1 |
Van Horne, S. | 1 |
Ward, A. S. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
García-Martínez, Carlos; Cerezo, Rebeca; Bermúdez, Manuel; Romero, Cristóbal – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2019
Most massive open online courses (MOOC) use simple schemes for aggregating peer grades, taking the mean or the median, or compute weights from information other than the instructor's opinion about the students' knowledge. To reduce the difference between the instructor and students' aggregated scores, some proposals compute specific weights to…
Descriptors: Scores, Online Courses, Grades (Scholastic), Peer Groups
Russell, J.; Van Horne, S.; Ward, A. S.; Bettis, E. A., III; Gikonyo, J. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2017
This study investigated students' evaluating process and their perceptions of peer assessment when they engaged in peer assessment using Calibrated Peer Review. Calibrated Peer Review is a web-based application that facilitates peer assessment of writing. One hundred and thirty-two students in an introductory environmental science course…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Student Evaluation, Focus Groups, Interviews
Novakovich, J. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2016
The introduction of digital literacy practices has created a tension in academia, with many academics challenging the view that critical thinking can be fostered on social networks. A quasi-experimental study was conducted on two sections of university-level writing classrooms to determine if there were meaningful differences in the quality of…
Descriptors: Critical Thinking, Reflection, Student Journals, Electronic Journals