Publication Date
| In 2025 | 5 |
| Since 2024 | 25 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 107 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 237 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 412 |
Descriptor
| College Faculty | 705 |
| Peer Evaluation | 705 |
| Higher Education | 320 |
| Foreign Countries | 209 |
| Evaluation Methods | 150 |
| Faculty Evaluation | 146 |
| Teacher Attitudes | 133 |
| Faculty Development | 123 |
| Feedback (Response) | 123 |
| Teaching Methods | 101 |
| Teacher Evaluation | 98 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Centra, John A. | 7 |
| Seldin, Peter | 6 |
| Chester, Andrea | 5 |
| Murray, Harry G. | 5 |
| Quinlan, Kathleen M. | 4 |
| Carless, David | 3 |
| Drew, Steve | 3 |
| Keig, Larry | 3 |
| Lee, Barbara A. | 3 |
| McKeachie, Wilbert J. | 3 |
| Shedd, Peter J. | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
| Australia | 47 |
| United Kingdom | 29 |
| Canada | 26 |
| China | 14 |
| United States | 14 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 8 |
| California | 7 |
| Germany | 6 |
| Illinois | 6 |
| New Zealand | 6 |
| South Africa | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Civil Rights Act 1964 Title… | 1 |
| Copyright Law 1976 | 1 |
| National Labor Relations… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Trends in International… | 2 |
| Motivated Strategies for… | 1 |
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
| National Survey of… | 1 |
| Program for International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textFernando Manuel Otero Saborido; José Antonio Domínguez-Montes; José Manuel Cenizo Benjumea; Gustavo González-Calvo – Educational Process: International Journal, 2024
Background/purpose: This study presents a systematic review of teaching observation instruments in the current literature based on PRISMA standards. Materials/methods: Three researchers performed searches on two databases, SCOPUS and Web of Science, focusing on two criteria: A) peer observation of teaching and B) higher education, with search…
Descriptors: Observation, Peer Evaluation, Foreign Countries, Measures (Individuals)
Direct linkHuifeng Mu; Christian D. Schunn – International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2025
Peer feedback can be highly effective for learning, but only when students give detailed and helpful feedback. Peer feedback systems often support student reviewers through instructor-generated comment prompts that include various scaffolding features. However, there is little research in the context of higher education on which features tend to…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Program Effectiveness, College Students
Tobiason, Glory – International Journal for Academic Development, 2023
This research investigates how peer observation programs can be designed to enhance faculty use of student-centered logic. Data include participants' self-reports (interviews) and 50 hours of recorded faculty-faculty dialogue. Findings suggest specific design features that may increase fluency in student-centered logic. The study may be useful to…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Observation, Student Centered Learning, College Faculty
Rocío Barrios-Rodríguez; Inmaculada Salcedo-Bellido; José Juan Jiménez-Moleón; Macarena Lozano-Lorca; Noelia Galiano-Castillo; Enrique José Cobos; José Dámaso Vílchez Rienda; Rocío Olmedo-Requena; Carmen Amezcua-Prieto; Sandra Martín-Peláez; Carmen María González Domenech; Juan Pedro Arrebola Moreno; Raúl A. Rica; María Eugenia García-Rubiño; Pilar Requena – International Journal for Academic Development, 2023
In a peer-review of teaching (PRT) program, we aimed to i) use pre- and post-observation questionnaires to enhance self-reflection, and ii) perform a nominal group technique (NGT) to agree on improvements. The questionnaires showed that PRT helped discovering new weaknesses but not new strengths, and that preconceived negative feelings vanished…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, College Faculty, Reflection
Eric T. Metzler; Lisa Kurz – To Improve the Academy, 2025
The claim has been made for decades that college teaching, like research, should be peer reviewed if we are to see it as a serious scholarly activity; yet peer review as a method of evaluating teaching is not widespread. Interest in peer review is increasing, however, as institutions have sought ways of evaluating teaching informed by professional…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Peer Evaluation, Faculty Development, Training
Cheryl J. Craig – Advances in Research on Teaching, 2024
Located at the place where excessive entitlement and the "best-loved self" intersect, this research illustrates what happens when the excessive entitlement of one educator trumps that of another. Then, in a perverse sort of way, those who are excessively entitled may even imply that the other is acting excessively entitled. This is how…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Graduate Students, Professional Recognition, Reputation
Xu, Wenna – ProQuest LLC, 2022
Teaching quality has long been a critical issue concerned by both educators and researchers in higher education. Many studies have proved that peer review of teaching (PRT), as one subtype of educational evaluation, can be an effective means to improve faculty teaching practices. This study aims to examine how PRT works to improve teaching quality…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, Teacher Improvement, College Faculty
Väyrynen, Karin; Lutovac, Sonja; Kaasila, Raimo – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2023
Previous research has emphasized both the importance of giving and receiving peer feedback for the purpose of active learning, as well as of university students' engagement in reflection to improve learning outcomes. However, requiring students to explicitly reflect on peer reviewing is an understudied learning activity in higher education that…
Descriptors: Reflection, Peer Evaluation, Undergraduate Students, Learner Engagement
Sin Wang Chong; Tingjun Lin – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
Feedback provided by peer reviewers plays a pivotal role in any journal peer-review model. Peer-review feedback helps authors reconsider their manuscripts in a new light and improve their work before it is published. While there is a wealth of knowledge and empirical evidence focusing on effective feedback practices in educational settings, there…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Journal Articles, Authors
Fethi A. Inan; Doris U. Bolliger – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2024
The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between online instructors' pedagogical beliefs and their choices of online learning activities. Data were collected from 167 faculty members with the use of online instructors' pedagogical beliefs and student learning activities surveys at a medium-sized masters-level public university…
Descriptors: Online Courses, Teacher Attitudes, Learning Activities, College Faculty
Wiberley, Stephen E., Jr.; Blecic, Deborah D.; De Groote, Sandra L.; Shultz, Mary – College & Research Libraries, 2023
This study adds to a series investigating the publication patterns of refereed articles in Library and Information Science (LIS) journals by United States academic librarians (USALs). The first study covered 1993-97, and subsequent studies continued in five-year increments. This study presents data and metrics for 2013-17 from fifty-two journals:…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Librarians, Publications, Faculty Publishing
Becky Wai-Ling Packard; Beronda L. Montgomery; Joi-Lynn Mondisa – International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 2024
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the experiences of multiple campus teams as they engaged in the assessment of their science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) mentoring ecosystems within a peer assessment dialogue exercise. Design/methodology/approach: This project utilized a qualitative multicase study method…
Descriptors: STEM Education, Mentors, Peer Evaluation, College Faculty
Fileborn, Bianca; Wood, Mark; Loughnan, Claire – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 2022
Research on peer review to date has focused on its role as a formal compliance mechanism, a process for enhancing and developing teaching practice, and as a considerable source of anxiety for educators. In this paper, we draw on scholarly reflections from our experience of undertaking a reciprocal, formative peer review in an Australian higher…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Peer Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, College Faculty
Burns, Mark A.; Gallimore, Alec D.; Zurbuchen, Thomas H.; Johnson, Valerie N.; Lattuca, Lisa R. – Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 2021
As some of the most stable and important structures in society, colleges and universities are rarely described as nimble. Yet, when the COVID-19 pandemic hit in March 2020, institutions across the globe not only shifted within days to online instruction, but many academic researchers also immediately launched efforts to understand the virus,…
Descriptors: Research, Financial Support, Resource Allocation, Peer Evaluation
Driscoll, Lori L. – ProQuest LLC, 2023
Online course quality is a prominent issue due to the increasing number of online programs and courses offered by institutions of higher education. To ensure the best student outcomes, it is necessary to implement effective systemic support for quality assurance in online learning. Providing faculty with the environmental supports required to…
Descriptors: Online Courses, Educational Quality, Quality Assurance, Instructional Design
