Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Faculty Evaluation | 7 |
| Peer Evaluation | 7 |
| Program Development | 7 |
| Evaluation Methods | 6 |
| Higher Education | 6 |
| College Faculty | 5 |
| Faculty Development | 3 |
| Guidelines | 3 |
| Student Evaluation of Teacher… | 3 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
| Nursing Education | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Chism, Nancy Van Note – 1999
This sourcebook is intended to help college administrators develop a strong peer review component for their faculty evaluation and development system. Part 1, an overview of peer review, provides arguments for peer review and briefly describes the process of establishing a peer review system. Chapter 1 reviews the tenets of effective evaluation of…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
Direct linkJordan, Catherine M.; Wong, Kristine A.; Jungnickel, Paul W.; Joosten, Yvonne A.; Leugers, Rebecca C.; Shields, Sharon L. – Metropolitan Universities, 2009
The Peer Review Workgroup of the Community-Engaged Scholarship for Health Collaborative developed a novel set of quality community-engaged scholarship characteristics and a resource package aimed at two primary audiences: faculty seeking promotion or tenure based on community-engaged scholarship; and review, promotion, and tenure committee members…
Descriptors: Tenure, Faculty Development, College Faculty, Guides
Peer reviewedDombeck, Mary T. – Nursing Outlook, 1986
Examines the three-pronged approach of the theme-centered interactional model that was adapted for use in a faculty clinician peer review group. The model involves the cognitive focus, the affective focus, and the interactional focus. Each approach is examined in detail. (CT)
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Guidelines, Higher Education, Nursing Education
Peer reviewedGorecki, Yvonne – Nursing Outlook, 1977
Describes a nursing program's four-step process in the development of, and the results of using, a peer review system by faculty members for evaluating their own teaching performance. (TA)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Medical Education, Nursing
Seldin, Peter – AGB Reports, 1988
Commonly asked questions about methods of faculty evaluation (including student, peer, and self-evaluation) are answered, and guidelines for improving a failing evaluation system are discussed. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Download full textRudmann, Jerry – 1990
Guidelines and resources for conducting a faculty evaluation were developed based on an evaluation project at Irvine Valley College (California). In the fall of 1989, eight instructors participated in a pilot test of evaluation through observation by two peers and the collection of rating forms completed by students. Participants also completed…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Community Colleges, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development
Narang, Harbans – 1992
This paper presents an approach to the evaluation of college faculty teaching which stresses input from students, colleagues, the department head, and the faculty member under review. Evaluation guidelines suggest that evaluation criteria and the measurement process, as well as the instruments used for measuring teacher performance, be jointly…
Descriptors: Classroom Observation Techniques, College Faculty, College Instruction, Criteria
