Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Peer Evaluation | 3 |
| Program Implementation | 3 |
| Writing Evaluation | 3 |
| Feedback (Response) | 2 |
| Revision (Written Composition) | 2 |
| Writing Assignments | 2 |
| Assignments | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Health Sciences | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Dayna Henry | 1 |
| Julia Sell | 1 |
| Lucy Bryan Malenke | 1 |
| Potter, Andrew | 1 |
| Schunn, Christian D. | 1 |
| Wilson, Joshua | 1 |
| Wu, Yong | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Dayna Henry; Julia Sell; Lucy Bryan Malenke – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2024
The chapter describes the design, implementation, and evaluation of repeated peer review assignments in a health sciences program. Details of the assignment, quantitative and qualitative indirect assessments, and considerations for implementing this type of assignment in other courses are provided.
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Assignments, Skill Development, Research Skills
Wu, Yong; Schunn, Christian D. – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2021
Implementing peer feedback in revisions is a complex process involving first planning to fix problems and then actual implementing feedback through revisions. Both phases are influenced by features of the peer feedback itself, but potentially in different ways, and yet prior research has not examined their separate role in planning or the…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation, Program Implementation, Writing Evaluation
Potter, Andrew; Wilson, Joshua – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2021
Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) provides automatic writing feedback and scoring to support student writing and revising. The purpose of the present study was to analyze a statewide implementation of an AWE software (n = 114,582) in grades 4-11. The goals of the study were to evaluate: (1) to what extent AWE features were used; (2) if equity and…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Scoring

Peer reviewed
Direct link
