Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 3 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 7 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 14 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 25 |
Descriptor
Peer Evaluation | 34 |
Writing Assignments | 34 |
Writing Evaluation | 34 |
Feedback (Response) | 13 |
Writing Instruction | 13 |
Revision (Written Composition) | 12 |
Student Attitudes | 12 |
Undergraduate Students | 12 |
Writing Improvement | 9 |
Higher Education | 7 |
Student Evaluation | 7 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Schunn, Christian D. | 5 |
Wu, Yong | 2 |
Achen, Rebecca M. | 1 |
Baer, Amy | 1 |
Baikadi, Alok | 1 |
Bali, Reetu | 1 |
Bergland, Bob | 1 |
Boyd, Cleo | 1 |
Bratkovich, Meghan Odsliv | 1 |
Brown, Bill | 1 |
Correnti, Richard J. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 30 |
Reports - Research | 19 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 7 |
Reports - Descriptive | 6 |
Reports - Evaluative | 5 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 18 |
Postsecondary Education | 16 |
Secondary Education | 4 |
High Schools | 3 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
New York (New York) | 2 |
California (Santa Barbara) | 1 |
China | 1 |
Ireland | 1 |
Missouri | 1 |
South Korea | 1 |
Taiwan | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Dayna Henry; Julia Sell; Lucy Bryan Malenke – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2024
The chapter describes the design, implementation, and evaluation of repeated peer review assignments in a health sciences program. Details of the assignment, quantitative and qualitative indirect assessments, and considerations for implementing this type of assignment in other courses are provided.
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Assignments, Skill Development, Research Skills
Wu, Yong; Schunn, Christian D. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2023
Although peer review has been widely used for formative assessment in writing instruction, there remain concerns about whether assessors are at a sufficient writing performance level that would allow them to identify major problems in the reviewed work and provide helpful feedback to improve draft quality. Little empirical research has examined…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Writing Skills, High School Students
Yin Deng; Pragasit Sitthitikul – rEFLections, 2025
While extensive research exists on peer feedback and its effects on writing, there are few experimental studies that rigorously investigate the effects of guided dialogic peer feedback on students' argumentative writing performance. This study, adopting a mixed-methods approach, examined the influence of guided dialogic peer feedback within a…
Descriptors: Blended Learning, Teaching Methods, English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction
Wu, Yong; Schunn, Christian D. – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2021
Implementing peer feedback in revisions is a complex process involving first planning to fix problems and then actual implementing feedback through revisions. Both phases are influenced by features of the peer feedback itself, but potentially in different ways, and yet prior research has not examined their separate role in planning or the…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation, Program Implementation, Writing Evaluation
Jamie Costley; Han Zhang; Matthew Courtney; Galina Shulgina; Matthew Baldwin; Mik Fanguy – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2025
While the use of collaborative peer editing is widespread in some online learning contexts, little is known about how constituent editing behaviours impact student writing quality when using shared online documents as the mediating tool. Therefore, the present study (n = 176) examines the effects of English language learners' peer editing…
Descriptors: Editing, Peer Evaluation, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Law, Sweety; Baer, Amy – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2020
This article reports an initiative to improve student writing by incorporating technology-based structured peer review in the revision process. Although the most important step of writing, the revision step, is overlooked by students for several reasons. We describe a successful 10-week long intervention with students from upper-level…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Writing Evaluation, Peer Evaluation, Technology Uses in Education
Timothy Oleksiak – College Composition and Communication, 2020
If, as I argue, student-to-student peer review is animated by "improvement imperatives" that make peer review a form of what Lauren Berlant calls "cruel optimism," then rhetoric and composition will need to imagine theories and structures for peer review that do not repeat cruel attachments. I offer slow peer review as a…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Writing Evaluation, Writing (Composition), Writing Assignments
Leanne Havis – Journal of Response to Writing, 2022
Metacognition emphasizes an awareness and understanding of one's thoughts and cognitive processes, along with management of cognition through multiple strategies, including organizing, monitoring, and adapting. Before students can truly become effective writers, they must develop an appreciation for the amount of planning, organization, and…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, College Freshmen, Writing Assignments, Writing Evaluation
Achen, Rebecca M. – Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2018
Improved writing can help students in their academic and professional careers, thus this action research project examined the use of three revision strategies in a graduate course by collecting three sources of data. One-sample t-tests revealed no significant differences across paper scores. However, students indicated rough drafts and rewrites…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Revision (Written Composition), Writing Evaluation, Peer Evaluation
Kostopoulou, Stergiani; O'Dwyer, Fergus – Language Learning in Higher Education, 2021
This evidence-based, procedural paper outlines academic writing peer review practices conducted by Pre-Master's Pathway and pre-undergraduate Foundation programme students at two Irish universities. The theoretical framework section presents the view that formative teacher feedback on student writing alone is insufficient, suggesting sustainable…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Undergraduate Students
Nguyen, Huy; Xiong, Wenting; Litman, Diane – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2017
A peer-review system that automatically evaluates and provides formative feedback on free-text feedback comments of students was iteratively designed and evaluated in college and high-school classrooms. Classroom assignments required students to write paper drafts and submit them to a peer-review system. When student peers later submitted feedback…
Descriptors: Computer Uses in Education, Computer Mediated Communication, Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation
Zhang, Fuhui; Schunn, Christian D.; Baikadi, Alok – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2017
Building upon self-regulated learning theories, we examined the nature of student writing goals and the relationship of these writing goals to revision alone and in combination with two other important sources of students' self-regulated revision--peer comments on their writing, and reflections for their own writing obtained from reviewing others'…
Descriptors: Revision (Written Composition), Writing (Composition), Student Educational Objectives, Peer Evaluation
Patchan, Melissa M.; Schunn, Christian D.; Correnti, Richard J. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2016
Although feedback is often seen as a critical component of the learning process, many open questions about how specific feedback features contribute to the effectiveness of feedback remain--especially in regards to peer feedback of writing. Nelson and Schunn (2009) identified several important features of peer feedback in their nature of feedback…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Revision (Written Composition), Regression (Statistics), Student Improvement
Moore, Lisa Jean – Feminist Teacher: A Journal of the Practices, Theories, and Scholarship of Feminist Teaching, 2016
Lisa Jean Moore describes a class assignment for her Social and Cultural Change course in which she was required to accommodate the material limitations of teaching within a highly regulated and restricted environment. This assignment, carried out in a women's prison, could be adapted for traditional college settings and travel abroad programs,…
Descriptors: Feminism, Teaching Methods, Females, Institutionalized Persons
Bali, Reetu – Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 2015
This essay explores what the development of writing might look like and how it might take shape in a secondary English classroom. The study problematises current definitions of progress. In direct opposition to standards-driven models, I propose an alternative way of thinking about the development of writers through a series of narrative accounts…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, English Instruction, Grade 7, Secondary School Students