Publication Date
In 2025 | 71 |
Since 2024 | 298 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1028 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2200 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3952 |
Descriptor
Peer Evaluation | 6481 |
Foreign Countries | 1909 |
Higher Education | 1548 |
Feedback (Response) | 1429 |
Teaching Methods | 1171 |
Student Attitudes | 1090 |
Evaluation Methods | 970 |
Self Evaluation (Individuals) | 882 |
College Students | 781 |
Student Evaluation | 757 |
College Faculty | 705 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Schunn, Christian D. | 19 |
Hwang, Gwo-Jen | 16 |
Noroozi, Omid | 13 |
Tsai, Chin-Chung | 13 |
Li, Lan | 11 |
Boud, David | 10 |
Panadero, Ernesto | 10 |
Asher, Steven R. | 9 |
Centra, John A. | 9 |
Yu, Fu-Yun | 9 |
Yu, Shulin | 9 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 349 |
Teachers | 308 |
Researchers | 119 |
Administrators | 102 |
Policymakers | 40 |
Students | 23 |
Media Staff | 7 |
Community | 4 |
Support Staff | 2 |
Counselors | 1 |
Parents | 1 |
More ▼ |
Location
Australia | 197 |
United Kingdom | 156 |
China | 150 |
Canada | 148 |
Taiwan | 110 |
Turkey | 96 |
Hong Kong | 66 |
Netherlands | 64 |
United States | 60 |
Japan | 59 |
Iran | 54 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 2 |
Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 2 |
Wiberley, Stephen E., Jr.; Blecic, Deborah D.; De Groote, Sandra L.; Shultz, Mary – College & Research Libraries, 2023
This study adds to a series investigating the publication patterns of refereed articles in Library and Information Science (LIS) journals by United States academic librarians (USALs). The first study covered 1993-97, and subsequent studies continued in five-year increments. This study presents data and metrics for 2013-17 from fifty-two journals:…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Librarians, Publications, Faculty Publishing
Power, Jason Richard; Tanner, David – European Journal of Engineering Education, 2023
Self and peer assessments have been identified as effective strategies to develop a deeper understanding of complex concepts, enhance meta-cognitive capacity, and support learner self-efficacy. This study examines data related to peer and self-assessment exercises completed within a university engineering programme (n=61). Data related to…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Feedback (Response), Engineering Education
Najla Fki – Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, 2023
This exploratory practice study examined the effectiveness of the feedback strategies currently in use at the Higher Institute of Applied Studies in the Humanities of Mahdia in relation to the practice of microteaching for Tunisian pre-service teachers. Qualitative and quantitative data from third-year students majoring in Education and Teaching…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Microteaching, Preservice Teachers, Foreign Countries
Kasch, Julia; Van Rosmalen, Peter; Henderikx, Maartje; Kalz, Marco – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
This study reports on the quantitative findings of an exploratory sequential mixed methods study in which the underlying factor structure of students' peer-feedback orientation (i.e. openness to provide and receive peer-feedback) was investigated. Building on the qualitative findings of a previous study in which the 'peer-feedback orientation'…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Attitude Measures
Törmänen, Juha; Hämäläinen, Raimo P.; Saarinen, Esa – Learning Organization, 2022
Purpose: This study aims to introduce the perceived systems intelligence (SI) inventory, developed based on the earlier published self-report SI inventory (Törmänen et al., 2016). It can be used together with earlier managerial level tools for building a learning organization and included in general 360-style evaluations in personnel development.…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Administration, Organizational Learning, Staff Development
Schut, Alice; van Mechelen, Maarten; Klapwijk, Remke M.; Gielen, Mathieu; de Vries, Marc J. – International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2022
Design feedback is an essential pedagogical tool that can help young novice designers navigate divergent and convergent paths while designing. However, design feedback is often met with resistance, which counteracts its potential to help novice designers evaluate their design and generate new solution directions. In this paper, we report on the…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Creative Thinking, Design, Peer Evaluation
Derrick, Gemma E.; Bayley, Julie – Research Evaluation, 2022
This article assesses the risk of two COVID-19-related changes necessary for the expert review of the REF2021's Impact criterion: the move from face to face (F2F) to virtual deliberation; and the changing research landscape caused by the COVID-19 crisis requiring an extension of deadlines, and accommodation of COVID-19-related mitigation. Peer…
Descriptors: COVID-19, Pandemics, Risk, Risk Assessment
Garcia, J. A.; Rodriguez-Sanchez, Rosa; Fdez-Valdivia, J. – Research Evaluation, 2022
Reviewers are humans and might be affected by cognitive biases when information overload comes into play. In fact, no amount of scientific training will completely mask the human impulses to partisanship. And the consequence is that authors may receive incorrect editorial decisions in their submissions to peer-reviewed journals. For instance, the…
Descriptors: Deception, Specialization, Efficiency, Peer Evaluation
Ingraham, Colette L.; Johnson, Emily M.; Lopez, Kenia – Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 2022
Research indicates the need for better training for consultants working in culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) schools. Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, this study investigated the use of the Consultation Peer Feedback Process (CPFP) as a tool for developing skills and perspectives among consultants. This study analyzed the…
Descriptors: Consultants, Novices, Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation
Namanloo, Alireza A.; Thorpe, Julie; Salehi-Abari, Amirali – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2022
Peer assessment systems are emerging in many settings, such as peer grading in large (online) classes, peer review in conferences, peer art evaluation, etc. However, peer assessments might not be as accurate as expert evaluations, thus rendering these systems unreliable. The reliability of peer assessment systems is influenced by various factors…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Graphs, Models, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Rashid, M. Parvez; Xiao, Yunkai; Gehringer, Edward F. – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2022
Peer assessment can be a more effective pedagogical method when reviewers provide quality feedback. But what makes feedback helpful to reviewees? Other studies have identified quality feedback as focusing on detecting problems, providing suggestions, or pointing out where changes need to be made. However, it is important to seek students'…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Natural Language Processing, Artificial Intelligence
Friedman, Alon – Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 2022
The R programming language and computing environment is a powerful and common platform used by life science researchers and educators for the analysis of big data. One of the benefits of using R in this context is its ability to visualize the results. Using R to generate visualizations has gained in popularity due to the increased number of R…
Descriptors: Visual Aids, Peer Evaluation, Scoring Rubrics, Programming Languages
Ramdeo, Shalini; Balwant, Paul; Fraser, Simon Harold – Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 2022
Purpose: As group work is becoming more common in the classroom, teamwork as an andragogical tool continues to be problematic for students in management programs. The purpose of this paper is to determine how university students perceive teamwork and to identify teamwork problems along with potential solutions. Design/methodology/approach: A…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Students, Student Attitudes, Teamwork
Peer Overmarking and Insufficient Diagnosticity: The Impact of the Rating Method for Peer Assessment
Van Meenen, Florence; Coertjens, Liesje; Van Nes, Marie-Claire; Verschuren, Franck – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2022
The present study explores two rating methods for peer assessment (analytical rating using criteria and comparative judgement) in light of concurrent validity, reliability and insufficient diagnosticity (i.e. the degree to which substandard work is recognised by the peer raters). During a second-year undergraduate course, students wrote a one-page…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Peer Evaluation, Accuracy, Evaluation Criteria
Lu, Meixiu; Chiu, Ming Ming – IEEE Transactions on Education, 2022
Contribution: Students do not naturally give unbiased, accurate peer assessments (PAs). Hence, giving teamwork guidelines to students can improve their cooperation, understanding of one another, PA attitude, and PA accuracy. Background: During collaborative learning, PA can improve students' autonomy, evaluation, and communication, which often…
Descriptors: Teamwork, Guidelines, Peer Evaluation, Student Attitudes