NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 31 to 45 of 6,481 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xiong, Yao; Schunn, Christian D.; Wu, Yong – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2023
Background: For peer assessment, reliability (i.e., consistency in ratings across peers) and validity (i.e., consistency of peer ratings with instructors or experts) are frequently examined in the research literature to address a central concern of instructors and students. Although the average levels are generally promising, both reliability and…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Keith, Caleb J.; Good, Megan R. – Assessment Update, 2023
In this article, the authors report on the opportunity to share information with fellow members from institutional accrediting agencies at the "Initi8: Improving Ethical Reasoning at Scale" workshop facilitated by James Madison University, in June 2023. Helpful was the various viewpoints, perspectives, and musings of individuals engaged…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Accreditation (Institutions), Ethics, Expectation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Erfan Heidari; Mahmoud Reza Saghafi – Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 2025
Purpose: This qualitative case study explores the challenges that architecture students encounter in grasping the concept of fair PA. The study also delves into the students' viewpoints on this matter and the strategies they utilize to navigate it. Design/methodology/approach: Around 29 architecture students took part in the PA process. Data was…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Undergraduate Students, Architectural Education, Building Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jinglei Yu; Shengquan Yu; Ling Chen – British Journal of Educational Technology, 2025
Video-based teacher online learning enables teachers to engage in reflective practice by watching others' classroom videos, providing peer feedback (PF) and reviewing others' work. However, the quality and reliability of PF often suffer due to variations in teaching proficiency among providers, which limits its usefulness for reviewers. To improve…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Reflection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brian Bothner; Shelley L. Lusetti; Robert S. Seville; Josh E. Baker; Brian Barnes; Peter R. Hoffmann; Carolyn J. Hovde – Advances in Physiology Education, 2025
Since 2001, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have funded the Institutional Development Award (IDeA) Network of Biomedical Research Excellence (INBRE) to expand biomedical research capacity among states in which NIH funding was historically low. The Western IDeA Region comprises seven states: Alaska, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico,…
Descriptors: Biomedicine, Medical Research, Networks, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tomás Alves; Francisco Sousa; Sandra Gama; Joaquim Jorge; Daniel Gonçalves – Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 2024
Recent research has leveraged peer assessment as a grading system tool where learners are involved in learning and evaluation. However, there is limited knowledge regarding individual differences, such as personality, in peer assessment tasks. We analyze how personality factors affect the peer assessment dynamics of a semester-long remote learning…
Descriptors: Personality, Peer Evaluation, Interaction, Individual Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Olga Viberg; Martine Baars; Rafael Ferreira Mello; Niels Weerheim; Daniel Spikol; Cristian Bogdan; Dragan Gasevic; Fred Paas – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background Study: Peer feedback has been used as an effective instructional strategy to enhance students' learning in higher education. Objectives: This paper reports on the findings of an explorative study that aimed to increase our understanding of the nature and role of peer feedback in the students' learning process in a computer-supported…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation, Computer Assisted Instruction, Cooperative Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Arif Hidayat; Ninuk Lustyantie; Fathiaty Murtadho – Journal of English Teaching, 2024
Translation is crucial in cross-cultural communication, especially in today's globalized world. Understanding translation techniques, such as the Molina-Albir technique, is key to producing high-quality translations. This study aims to evaluate the understanding and application of Molina-Albir translation techniques among English Literature…
Descriptors: Translation, Program Effectiveness, English Literature, English (Second Language)
Malisa Dawn Johnson – ProQuest LLC, 2022
In American schools, teachers seldom have time to see each other teach resulting in missed opportunities to learn and grow from one another. Participants engaged in peer observation and feedback in order to determine the effectiveness of this professional development structure on practitioner growth, teacher efficacy, and overall teacher…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Faculty Development, Teacher Collaboration
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zong, Zheng; Schunn, Christian D. – International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2023
Online peer feedback has proven to be practically useful for instructors and to be useful for learning, especially for the feedback provider. Because students can vary widely in skill level, some research has explored matching reviewer and author by performance level. However, past research on the impacts of reviewer matching has found little…
Descriptors: Computer Mediated Communication, Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation, Biology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lekelia D. Jenkins – Journal of College Science Teaching, 2023
Existing processes for academic peer review can yield unnecessarily harsh critiques that focus on any vulnerability rather than constructive feedback to improve the work. Efforts to improve the peer-review process recommend training at the graduate level. This article describes the Modified Critical Response Process (MCRP) as a means to achieve…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Science Instruction, Feedback (Response), Graduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eva Barlösius; Laura Paruschke; Axel Philipps – Research Evaluation, 2023
Peer review has developed over time to become the established procedure for assessing and assuring the scientific quality of research. Nevertheless, the procedure has also been variously criticized as conservative, biased, and unfair, among other things. Do scientists regard all these flaws as equally problematic? Do they have the same opinions on…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Grantsmanship, Research Projects, Grants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Keith J. Topping; Ed Gehringer; Hassan Khosravi; Srilekha Gudipati; Kaushik Jadhav; Surya Susarla – International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2025
This paper surveys research and practice on enhancing peer assessment with artificial intelligence. Its objectives are to give the structure of the theoretical framework underpinning the study, synopsize a scoping review of the literature that illustrates this structure, and provide a case study which further illustrates this structure. The…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Artificial Intelligence, Grades (Scholastic), Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Catherine Davies; Holly Ingram – Research Evaluation, 2025
As part of the shift towards a more equitable research culture, funders are reconsidering traditional approaches to peer review. In doing so, they seek to minimize bias towards certain research ideas and researcher profiles, to ensure greater inclusion of disadvantaged groups, to improve review quality, to reduce burden, and to enable more…
Descriptors: Resource Allocation, Research, Culture, Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yadang Chen; Chuanyan Hao; Anqi Zheng; Feng Liu – Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2025
The aim of this study is to investigate how the emotional orientations in peer assessment affect student performance. Given that the emotional data in peer comments exist in the form of unstructured text, this study applied the text sentiment analysis method to the mining and analysis of peer-review texts. For this purpose, emotional orientations…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, College Students, Academic Achievement, Psychological Patterns
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  433