Descriptor
Perception Tests | 4 |
Reading Ability | 3 |
Reading Research | 3 |
Elementary Education | 2 |
Reading Difficulties | 2 |
Visual Perception | 2 |
Auditory Discrimination | 1 |
Auditory Tests | 1 |
Dyslexia | 1 |
High Achievement | 1 |
Learning Problems | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Research in Reading | 4 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Olson, Arthur V. – Journal of Research in Reading, 1980
Discusses two frequently recommended tests for the evaluation of visual perception in relation to reading ability: the Frostig Development Test of Visual Perception and the Bender Visual Motor Gestalt Test. Questions the content validity of the former and suggests that the latter is a reasonable predictor of reading achievement. (FL)
Descriptors: Perception Tests, Reading Achievement, Reading Diagnosis, Reading Difficulties

Hicks, Carolyn; Jackson, Peter – Journal of Research in Reading, 1981
Forty dyslexic children were given a version of the Stroop test which requires subjects to respond to attributes of a set of stimuli while ignoring the conflicting information that derives from another attribute. A negative linear relationship emerged indicating that greater reading proficiency was associated with less interference. (MKM)
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Elementary Education, Perception Tests, Reading Ability

Riding, R. J.; Pugh, J. C. – Journal of Research in Reading, 1981
When groups of children were given a test of visual performance designed to measure their dark interval threshold, differences were found between boys and girls and differences were found indicating that those children who had a moderate threshold showed superior reading ability. (MKM)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, High Achievement, Low Achievement, Perception Tests

Shapiro, Jon; And Others – Journal of Research in Reading, 1990
Administers a battery of auditory perceptual processing tasks to 103 reading disabled children and 103 average readers. Finds that auditory discrimination did not discriminate between the groups. States that 2 levels of phonological awareness exist and that screening and diagnostic instruments should address both to have predictive validity. (MG)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Tests, Learning Problems, Perception Tests