NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scruggs, Richard; McDermott, Paul A.; Qiao, Xin – Innovative Higher Education, 2019
Research impact is very important in academia. This study explored the research impact of faculty in doctoral higher education programs through the use of Hirsch's "h" index as measured by Google Scholar results. Characteristics of the "h" index in this field are discussed, and norms are offered for professors of different…
Descriptors: Faculty Publishing, Reputation, Institutional Characteristics, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Rock, JoAnn Leah; Adler, Rachel M. – ETS Research Report Series, 2014
The purpose of this study was to investigate the ways in which universities use the "GRE"® General Test scores to award merit-based fellowships to first-year graduate students in doctoral programs. While GRE use in fellowship award decisions is a common practice, there is very little validity evidence to support its use in this context.…
Descriptors: Scores, Decision Making, College Entrance Examinations, Graduate Study
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kranzler, John H.; Grapin, Sally L.; Daley, Matt L. – Journal of School Psychology, 2011
This study examined the research productivity and scholarly impact of faculty in APA-accredited school psychology programs using data in the PsycINFO database from 2005 to 2009. We ranked doctoral programs on the basis of authorship credit, number of publications, and number of citations. In addition, we examined the primary publication outlets of…
Descriptors: Productivity, Doctoral Programs, School Psychology, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Townsend, James M.; Ryan, Joseph J. – Journal of Instructional Psychology, 2010
We assessed the relationship between "U.S. News and World Report" 2008 rankings of clinical psychology doctoral programs and scores earned by graduates on the Examination for Professional Practice in Psychology (EPPP). For the top 25 programs, relationship between ranking and EPPP scores was not significant, r[subscript s] = -0.28. EPPP scores…
Descriptors: Doctoral Programs, Clinical Psychology, Reputation, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jared DuPree, W.; White, Mark B.; Meredith, William H.; Ruddick, Lindsay; Anderson, Michael P. – Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 2009
Due to an increasing trend among states to cut higher education funds, many universities are relying more on private donations and federal funding to keep programs afloat. Scholarship productivity in general has become an integral factor in terms of universities granting tenure to faculty, allocating resources, and supporting program goals due to…
Descriptors: Productivity, Faculty Publishing, Doctoral Programs, Family Counseling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schloss, Patrick J.; Sindelar, Paul T. – Teacher Education and Special Education, 1986
Journal publication frequencies of faculty members (N=892) of 81 doctorate-granting special education programs were analyzed with program reputational rankings. Mean program and per-capita frequencies over 5 years were 17.06 and 1.60 (respectively) and correlated positively but weakly with reputational rankings, suggesting that reputation is only…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Doctoral Programs, Exceptional Child Research, Faculty Publishing
Chaney, J. Don; Eddy, James M.; O'Rourke, Thomas W. – American Journal of Health Education, 2004
The purpose of this study was to replicate the Notaro, O'Rourke, and Eddy study to rank doctoral programs in health education, incorporating comments from professionals in health education to enhance the ranking study methods. This study used a multiple set of variables weighted by scholars and leaders in the field of health education. These…
Descriptors: Comprehensive School Health Education, Doctoral Programs, Health Education, Evaluation Criteria