NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)1
Source
Journal of Consulting and…182
Education Level
Audience
Researchers1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 182 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schinka, John A. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2012
Objective: Issues regarding the readability of self-report assessment instruments, methods for establishing the reading ability level of respondents, and guidelines for development of scales designed for marginal readers have been inconsistently addressed in the literature. A recent study by McHugh and Behar (2009) provided new findings relevant…
Descriptors: Psychopathology, Test Items, Reading Skills, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kroger, Rolf O.; Turnbull, William – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970
In a replication of earlier findings by Kroger, the hypothesis was tested that the situation affects test performance by generating a set of role demands. Community college students described themselves on the SVIB, Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale, and Welsh Figure Preference Test after being exposed to implicit social cues intended to induce…
Descriptors: Performance Factors, Personality Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barad, Susan J.; Hughes, Honore M. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1984
Applied three readability formulas differing in criterion for comprehension (50-100 percent) to the Personality Inventory for Children (PIC), Revised Format, and to abbreviated forms of the inventory. Results showed that for each method of analysis, readability of abbreviated forms approximates readability of the entire inventory. (LLL)
Descriptors: Children, Elementary Education, Personality Measures, Readability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Young, Rhodes C. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972
Descriptors: Personality Assessment, Personality Measures, Prediction, Psychological Patterns
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Roger C. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972
Descriptors: Ambiguity, Item Analysis, Personality Assessment, Personality Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McClelland, David C. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972
Descriptors: Opinions, Personality Assessment, Personality Measures, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Clopton, James R.; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980
The results of this study support the continued use of the MacAndrew Alcoholism Scale in screening patients to identify those who abuse alcohol. (Author)
Descriptors: Alcoholism, Drug Abuse, Identification, Patients
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Irvine, Michael J.; Gendreau, Paul – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974
This study investigated attempts at faking the 16 PF in both a good and bad direction by prisoners. The results of the prison sample were compared to a control sample of college students. Results showed that the 16 PF can not be faked with impunity. (Author/EK)
Descriptors: College Students, Personality Measures, Positive Reinforcement, Prisoners
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hoffmann, Norman G.; Butcher, James N. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975
Three Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory short forms, the Mini-Mult, Faschingbauer's 166, and the MMPI-168, which were constructed by different methodologies, were compared on a sample of 1,028 psychiatric patients. Results of this study seriously question the use of MMPI short forms for clinical interpretation. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Personality Measures, Psychological Testing, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mungas, Dan – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1984
Discriminated three groups of neuropsychiatric outpatients (N=138) using a measure of aggression formed by summing subscales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Results indicated that the group differences cannot be attributed to more general factors such as age, sex, education, IQ or degree of overall psychopathology. (LLL)
Descriptors: Aggression, Diagnostic Tests, Discriminant Analysis, Patients
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Edwards, Allen L.; Abbott, Robert D. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973
The present study was undertaken to determine the degree to which the EPPS and PRF scales are correlated with the EPI scales, and also to determine the degree to which the scales in all three inventories are measuring the same common traits. (Author)
Descriptors: Correlation, Evaluation, Personality Measures, Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mischel, Walter – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972
The general findings support the utility of direct compared to indirect approaches to personality measurement. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Personality Assessment, Personality Measures, Psychological Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Herrell, James M. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971
This study demonstrates how administrative variables can alter the utility of a current MMPI test. Individual administration was significantly superior to group administration and special" administration was significantly superior to routine administration. (Author/CG)
Descriptors: Personality Measures, Test Results, Testing, Testing Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rosenblatt, Arthur I.; Pritchard, David A. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978
Multiple discriminant analysis of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) scores between high-IQ White, high-IQ Black, low-IQ White, and low-IQ Black subjects yielded two significant canonical variates. Results suggest that racial differences on the MMPI do not occur in all racial comparisons but are restricted to low-IQ groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Blacks, Intelligence Differences, Personality Measures, Personality Traits
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Prokop, Charles K. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1986
Examined the nature of elevations on the Hysteria scale of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory in low back pain patients. Subscales reflecting somatic complaints were more powerful predictors of diagnostic status than were subscales with nonsomatic content. Overlapping and nonoverlapping items on the Hysteria and Hypochondriasis scales…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Emotional Problems, Mental Health, Personality Measures
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13