NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 27 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Roh, Kyeong Hah; Parr, Erika David; Eckman, Derek; Sellers, Morgan – North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2022
The purpose of this paper is to highlight issues related to students' personal inferences that arise when students verbally explain their justification for calculus statements. We conducted clinical interviews with three undergraduate students who had taken first-semester calculus but had not yet been exposed to formal proof writing activities…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Calculus, Mathematics Instruction, Inferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Siegfried, John; Colander, David – Journal of Economic Education, 2022
Teaching students to use critical thinking skills is a popular goal of many economics courses. But what does "critical thinking" really mean, and how is it implemented? This article considers various interpretations of "critical thinking" and distinguishes "big-think" from "little-think" critical thinking,…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Economics Education, Critical Thinking, Textbooks
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xing, Wanli; Lee, Hee-Sun; Shibani, Antonette – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2020
Constructing scientific arguments is an important practice for students because it helps them to make sense of data using scientific knowledge and within the conceptual and experimental boundaries of an investigation. In this study, we used a text mining method called Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to identify underlying patterns in students…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Science Instruction, Scientific Concepts, Logical Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lieber, Leonie; Graulich, Nicole – Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2022
Building scientific arguments is a central ability for all scientists regardless of their specific domain. In organic chemistry, building arguments is a necessary skill to estimate reaction processes in consideration of the reactivities of reaction centres or the chemical and physical properties. Moreover, building arguments for multiple reaction…
Descriptors: Chemistry, Science Instruction, Organic Chemistry, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Nuñez-Gutierrez, Karina; Cabañas-Sánchez, Guadalupe – North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2022
The objective of this article is to describe types of mathematical reasoning evidenced by a middle school mathematics teacher, when answering two generalization questions in a figural pattern generalization task, related to quadratic sequences. Reasoning is delimited from teacher's arguments, reconstructed from a theoretical-methodological…
Descriptors: Mathematics Skills, Mathematics Instruction, Middle School Teachers, Mathematics Teachers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stephens, Rachel G.; Dunn, John C.; Hayes, Brett K. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2019
When asked to determine whether a syllogistic argument is deductively valid, people are influenced by their prior beliefs about the believability of the conclusion. Recently, two competing explanations for this belief bias effect have been proposed, each based on signal detection theory (SDT). Under a response bias explanation, people set more…
Descriptors: Beliefs, Bias, Logical Thinking, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Laursen, Bethany K. – Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 2018
This article aims to convince readers of the value of intersecting the scholarship of interdisciplinarity with the field of argumentation studies. The interdisciplinarity literature has not much engaged with the vehicle that carries interdisciplinary learning, languages, and locutions: the argument. On the argumentation studies side, despite the…
Descriptors: Interdisciplinary Approach, Persuasive Discourse, Inferences, Pattern Recognition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Goldman, Susan R.; Britt, M. Anne; Brown, Willard; Cribb, Gayle; George, MariAnne; Greenleaf, Cynthia; Lee, Carol D.; Shanahan, Cynthia – Grantee Submission, 2016
This paper presents a framework and methodology for designing learning goals targeted at what students need to know and be able to do in order to attain high levels of literacy and achievement in three disciplinary areas--literature, science, and history. For each discipline, a team of researchers, teachers, and specialists in that discipline…
Descriptors: Literacy, Educational Objectives, Literature, Sciences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fenton, Norman; Neil, Martin; Lagnado, David A. – Cognitive Science, 2013
A Bayesian network (BN) is a graphical model of uncertainty that is especially well suited to legal arguments. It enables us to visualize and model dependencies between different hypotheses and pieces of evidence and to calculate the revised probability beliefs about all uncertain factors when any piece of new evidence is presented. Although BNs…
Descriptors: Networks, Bayesian Statistics, Persuasive Discourse, Models
Bunting, William J. – ProQuest LLC, 2012
The overall direction of this research is to improve the development of information systems within federal agency modernization efforts so that the systems produce a value to the federal agency that is significantly greater upon implementation than the investment required to develop the systems. Federal agencies are modernizing at an increasing…
Descriptors: Information Systems, Public Agencies, Federal Government, Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Wilson, Nancy Effinger – CEA Forum, 2015
Thomas Rickert warns of the dangers of "pedagogies that seek the disruption and politicization of hierarchies of power and privilege, especially in terms of race, class, and gender" because they can "nevertheless produce new forms of power and privilege that in turn produce new resistances, further alienate already cynical students,…
Descriptors: Racial Bias, Social Bias, Social Attitudes, Power Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Warren, James E. – English Journal, 2010
In the Toulmin model, arguments begin with a "claim" supported by "data." The movement from claim to data is authorized by a general, unstated proposition Stephen E. Toulmin calls the "warrant." Unlike all other components of the Toulmin model, warrants usually remain implicit in an argument; they are the unspoken assumptions that bind together…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Writing Instruction, Models, Logical Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Feng, Mingyu, Ed.; Käser, Tanja, Ed.; Talukdar, Partha, Ed. – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2023
The Indian Institute of Science is proud to host the fully in-person sixteenth iteration of the International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM) during July 11-14, 2023. EDM is the annual flagship conference of the International Educational Data Mining Society. The theme of this year's conference is "Educational data mining for…
Descriptors: Information Retrieval, Data Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Navarro, Adria E.; Wilber, Kathleen H.; Yonashiro, Jeanine; Homeier, Diana C. – Gerontologist, 2010
Purpose: Elder abuse cases are often time consuming and complex, requiring interagency cooperation from a diverse array of professionals. Although multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) offer a potentially powerful approach to synergizing the efforts of different providers, there has been little research on elder abuse MDTs in general or elder abuse…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Elder Abuse, Cooperation, Logical Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brown, Nathaniel J. S.; Furtak, Erin Marie; Timms, Michael; Nagashima, Sam O.; Wilson, Mark – Educational Assessment, 2010
Recent science education reforms have emphasized the importance of students engaging with and reasoning from evidence to develop scientific explanations. A number of studies have created frameworks based on Toulmin's (1958/2003) argument pattern, whereas others have developed systems for assessing the quality of students' reasoning to support…
Descriptors: Science Education, Logical Thinking, Thinking Skills, Evidence
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2