NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gussmann, Edmund – Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 1973
It is asserted that the treatment of intonation within the framework of generative grammar has not shown whether surface syntactic structure is sufficient for formulation of phonological rules. An attempt is made to demonstrate that within English phonology reference to deep structure is necessary. (Available from: See FL 508 214). (RM)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Intonation, Language Universals
Hjelmslev, Louis – 1970
Louis Hjelmslev (1899-1965), whose linguistic theories have been influential both in his native Denmark and throughout the world, here describes in larger perspective and in a manner intended for the layman, certain aspects of linguistic science. He begins by distinguishing the functional analysis of a single language from the description of a…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Deep Structure, Diachronic Linguistics, Language Typology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Droste, F. G. – Linguistics, 1973
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Function Words, Kernel Sentences, Language Universals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vennemann, Theodore – Glossa, 1972
Descriptors: Consonants, Deep Structure, Descriptive Linguistics, Diachronic Linguistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Newton, D. E. – Journal of Linguistics, 1971
Research supported by a Canada Council Leave Fellowship and the President's Research Fund, Simon Fraser University, Canada. (VM)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Diachronic Linguistics, Dialects, Distinctive Features (Language)
Chafe, Wallace L. – 1970
This book offers a theory of language which departs from both structuralist and Chomskyan transformational linguistics in using semantic structure as its base. The theory is illustrated mostly from English by means of a step-by-step analysis of a large part of English semantic structure. A specific and detailed theory of language is thus…
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Deep Structure, Diachronic Linguistics, English
Di Pietro, Robert J. – 1968
Seeking out inter-language differences in the execution of a contrastive analysis is given priority over looking for manifestations of language universals. But unless a contrastive study is based upon an understanding of language universals and contains a set of instructions for how each language realizes them, the common ground for contrast can…
Descriptors: Contrastive Linguistics, Deep Structure, Language Universals, Linguistic Theory
Heringer, James T.; And Others – 1972
This collection of working papers contains four papers on varied topics in lintuistic theory. The first paper, "Some Grammatical Correlates of Felicity Conditions and Presuppositions," attempts to show that there is a systematic relationship between what a speaker of a language does in uttering sentences of that language and the syntactic form of…
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Descriptive Linguistics, Diachronic Linguistics, Grammar
Cairns, Charles; Silva, Dolores – 1969
The present level of understanding of the psycholinguistic processes and capacities underlying the child's acquisition of language is reviewed in this publication. In the first chapter, linguistic theories, biological characteristics of language learning, and the distinctions between language competence and language performance are discussed. The…
Descriptors: Child Language, Deep Structure, Generative Grammar, Language
Fillenbaum, Samuel – 1971
This article provides a discussion of current topics in psycholinguistics and of the current research on these problems. The author discusses current thought on the biological foundations of language and the problem of universals. If human language is a species-particular achievement contingent upon a biological endowment, there should be certain…
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Child Language, Deep Structure, Grammar
Starosta, Stanley – 1970
In line with current thinking in transformational grammar, syntax as a system can and should be studied before a study is made of the use of that system. Chomsky's lexical redundancy rule is an area for further study, possibly to come closer to defining and achieving explanatory adequacy. If it is observed that English nouns come in two types,…
Descriptors: Case (Grammar), Componential Analysis, Deep Structure, Descriptive Linguistics