NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)3
Since 2006 (last 20 years)4
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Education for All Handicapped…1
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 21 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Armijo-Olivo, Susan; Craig, Rodger; Campbell, Sandy – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Background: Evidence from new health technologies is growing, along with demands for evidence to inform policy decisions, creating challenges in completing health technology assessments (HTAs)/systematic reviews (SRs) in a timely manner. Software can decrease the time and burden by automating the process, but evidence validating such software is…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Software, Decision Making, Randomized Controlled Trials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Roelofs, Susan; Edwards, Nancy; Viehbeck, Sarah; Anderson, Cody – Research Evaluation, 2019
Evaluation of interdisciplinary, team science research initiatives is an evolving and challenging field. This descriptive, longitudinal, mixed methods case study examined how an embedded, formative evaluation approach contributed to team science in the interdisciplinary Research into Policy to Enhance Physical Activity (REPOPA) project, which…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Interdisciplinary Approach, Physical Activities, Educational Policy
Ford, Cheryl – ProQuest LLC, 2016
Over the past 30 years, public health Practitioners worldwide have increasingly relied on Health Impact Assessments (HIAs) as a tool for informing decision makers of the potential health impacts of proposed policies, programs, and planning decisions. Adoption of the HIA is significantly less common in the United States than in international…
Descriptors: Public Health, Outcome Measures, Qualitative Research, Grounded Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Volkov, Boris B. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
The chapter explores critical roles of internal evaluators in contemporary organizational settings. The need is highlighted for an expanded, reconfigured, unorthodox set of roles and styles of work to meet the needs of the emerging learning organizations effectively. A discussion of major categories of internal evaluator roles emerged from the…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Evaluative Thinking, Evaluation Methods, Role
Krotseng, Marsha V.; McLaughlin, Gerald W. – 1998
This paper examines the many facets of administrative information management on the college or university campus. It is argued that, depending on the situation, an effective information manager can adopt the outlook of an architect/designer, data administrator, editor, analyst, reporter, planner, broker, collaborator, interpreter, or marketer.…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, College Administration, Decision Making, Educational Planning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Weiss, Carol H. – Evaluation Practice, 1988
The role of the evaluator in the decision-making process is discussed. Topics covered include identification of decision makers and decision-making processes, delineation of informational needs, identification of the various media and forums for evaluation ideas, and definition of functions that evaluators serve. (TJH)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluators, Media Selection, Needs Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ade, William – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1982
Two politically oriented factors are cited as major impediments to effective conveyance of evaluation findings to decision makers. The first factor, relevance, includes the elements of timing and matching of perceptions. The second, constituency support, includes recognition of reference groups and political benefits. (Author/LC)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators, Policy Formation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1980
Educator and author Laurence E. Lynn recommends the case study as a method for training policy analysts to understand the cognitive style and uniqueness of the decision makers they serve. Analysts must be interdisciplinary, politically knowledgable, yet unbiased. Policy analysis, particularly by external institutions, is spreading to Congress. (CP)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Decision Making, Evaluators, Federal Government
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Chelimsky, Eleanor – Knowledge and Policy, 1995
Discusses evaluation in terms of what can be expected, changes in the use of evaluation methods, and the importance of evaluation credibility. Notes that evaluation has improved in practice and in decision-maker support for it; credible evaluations are now typically incorporated into policy and have become a routine organizational practice. (AEF)
Descriptors: Adoption (Ideas), Change, Credibility, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
King, Jean A. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1988
Based on a review of research on evaluation use, the implications for future research and for improving the practice of evaluation are discussed. Six principles of evaluation use are outlined, and internalization of evaluation functions by decision makers is addressed. (TJH)
Descriptors: Administrators, Decision Making, Educational Assessment, Evaluation Utilization
Conner, Ross F. – 1978
A model for the evaluator-policy maker relationship is presented for use by those responsible for conducting program evaluations which ultimately affect policy decisions. In this collegial model, power is invested equally in relevant research and program personnel. Characteristics of the model are described in terms of: (1) early contact with the…
Descriptors: Consultation Programs, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Posante, Rebecca – 1981
Policy-making problems being faced in Louisiana regarding the testing of handicapped students within a state mandated minimum competency testing program are dealt with. The decision-making process is complicated by the fact that two groups (staff administering the test and staff administering programs for the handicapped) with differing…
Descriptors: Agency Cooperation, Decision Making, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Woog, Pierre – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1992
The Senate confirmation hearings concerning Robert Gates as director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) highlight the problems evaluators share with the CIA of keeping policy imperatives out of the search for truth. The CIA at least has a structure for keeping information pure, but many evaluations do not. (SLD)
Descriptors: Agency Role, Data Analysis, Decision Making, Ethics
Brown, Robert D.; And Others – 1977
The impact of professional jargon and data-based statements in evaluation reports on audience responses to an evaluation report and an evaluator's recommendations was examined. Subjects read one of four evaluation reports about testing and grading procedures in a school program. The reports varied in the amount of jargon and data used to justify…
Descriptors: Audiences, Communication (Thought Transfer), Credibility, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wolf, Robert L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
The Judicial Evaluation Method (JEM) is useful for aiding decision-making bodies to formulate policies. Broad public participation in complex issues is provided by JEM. (The conceptualization, policy formulation stages, and participant roles are identified; and the model is applied in two case studies). (MH)
Descriptors: Community Involvement, Court Role, Data Analysis, Data Collection
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2