Descriptor
Political Science | 7 |
Testing Problems | 7 |
Higher Education | 6 |
Standardized Tests | 3 |
Student Evaluation | 3 |
United States Government… | 3 |
Writing Evaluation | 3 |
Advanced Placement | 2 |
College Instruction | 2 |
Essays | 2 |
Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Burns, Richard L. | 1 |
Conradt, David | 1 |
House, Ernest R. | 1 |
Langran, Robert W. | 1 |
McLauchlan, William | 1 |
Miller, Jeff | 1 |
Ziegler, David W. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 4 |
Teachers | 4 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Advanced Placement… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Conradt, David – Political Science Teacher, 1989
Defends the grading of the advanced placement examinations in U.S. government and politics courses. Provides the criteria used for the selection of the readers. Points out among 27 readers in 1989, all had masters' degrees and 4 held doctorates in political science or international relations. Claims high school instructors in the program are…
Descriptors: Advanced Placement Programs, Equivalency Tests, Political Science, Secondary Education
Langran, Robert W. – Teaching Political Science, 1978
Discusses college students' general disregard for factual information when writing political science examinations. Concludes that students should be taught to support answers with factual information. Suggests ways to construct examinations which require factual knowledge. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Educational Trends, Higher Education, Knowledge Level
Ziegler, David W. – Political Science Teacher, 1989
Presents an exercise designed to nullify student claims of subjectivity in the grading of essay examinations. Asks students to grade sample essay questions according to specific criteria. Discusses benefits of the exercise. Provides sample essays and answers, and illustrates the difference between analytical and narrative answers. (RW)
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Higher Education, Political Science
Burns, Richard L. – 1990
In an exploration of customizing the Major Field Achievement Test in Political Science (MFATPS), developed by the Educational Testing Service, a questionnaire was sent to the heads of political science and joint departments which offer a bachelor's degree in Political Science. A total of 1,017 departments were surveyed in January 1990; 293…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, College Faculty, Department Heads, Higher Education

Miller, Jeff – College Teaching, 1999
A college faculty member who has graded Advanced Placement exam essays on U.S. government and politics, taken mostly by high school juniors and seniors, suggests that high school teachers and college faculty who assess the essays are not the best qualified persons to do so and that despite efforts to ensure consistency, the resulting scores are…
Descriptors: Advanced Placement, College Instruction, Essays, Evaluation Criteria

McLauchlan, William – College Teaching, 1999
A faculty consultant to the Educational Testing Service for advanced placement (AP) test reading in U.S. government and politics responds to an article criticizing essay evaluation methods and criteria, finding in it a fundamental misunderstanding of the AP reading process and explaining why the essays are subject to less scrutiny for style,…
Descriptors: Advanced Placement, College Instruction, Essays, Evaluation Criteria
House, Ernest R.; And Others – 1987
Three political scientists, three historians, three social studies professors (higher education), and seven secondary school teachers of social studies or history were interviewed. Focus was on assessing key concepts in the subjects' disciplines and what concepts should be taught and tested for at the high school level, with a view toward…
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Educational Assessment, High Schools, Higher Education