Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Bridges, Mindy Sittner | 2 |
Catts, Hugh W. | 2 |
Elbro, Carsten | 1 |
Gellert, Anna S. | 1 |
Herrera, Sarah | 1 |
Nielsen, Diane Corcoran | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Early Childhood Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 2 |
Kindergarten | 2 |
Primary Education | 2 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Denmark | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Dynamic Indicators of Basic… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gellert, Anna S.; Elbro, Carsten – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2017
A few studies have indicated that dynamic measures of phonological awareness may contribute uniquely to the prediction of early reading development. However, standard control measures have been few and limited by floor effects, thus limiting their predictive value. The purpose of the present study was to examine the predictive value of a dynamic…
Descriptors: Reading Difficulties, Early Reading, Phonological Awareness, Longitudinal Studies
Catts, Hugh W.; Herrera, Sarah; Nielsen, Diane Corcoran; Bridges, Mindy Sittner – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2015
The simple view of reading proposes that reading comprehension is the product of word reading and language comprehension. In this study, we used the simple view framework to examine the early prediction of reading comprehension abilities. Using multiple measures for all constructs, we assessed word reading precursors (i.e., letter knowledge,…
Descriptors: Prediction, Reading Comprehension, Sight Method, Language Acquisition
Bridges, Mindy Sittner; Catts, Hugh W. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2011
This study examined the usefulness and predictive validity of a dynamic screening of phonological awareness in two samples of kindergarten children. In one sample (n = 90), the predictive validity of the dynamic assessment was compared to a static version of the same screening measure. In the second sample (n = 96), the dynamic screening measure…
Descriptors: Reading Difficulties, Reading Achievement, Screening Tests, Phonological Awareness