NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)4
Education Level
Higher Education1
Audience
Researchers1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 43 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sellbom, Martin; Toomey, Joseph A.; Wygant, Dustin B.; Kucharski, L. Thomas; Duncan, Scott – Psychological Assessment, 2010
The current study examined the utility of the recently released Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF; Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008) validity scales to detect feigned psychopathology in a criminal forensic setting. We used a known-groups design with the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS;…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Criminals, Validity, Psychopathology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xiao, Lijun; Han, Jing; Han, Jian – Journal of Career Assessment, 2011
In this article, the authors present the findings of two studies analyzing new recruits' adjustment to army life in the Chinese military. In the first exploratory study, we developed a scale to measure new recruits' adjustment to military life, and found that new soldiers' adaptation could be divided into two distinct types: interpersonal…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Adjustment (to Environment), Military Personnel, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Efendov, Adele A.; Sellbom, Martin; Bagby, R. Michael – Psychological Assessment, 2008
The authors examined the comparative predictive capacity of the Trauma Symptom Inventory (TSI) Atypical Response Scale (ATR) and the standard set of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) fake-bad validity scales (i.e., F, F[subscript B[prime]], F[subscript p[prime]], FBS) to detect feigned posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).…
Descriptors: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Test Validity, Personality Traits, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sellbom, Martin; Bagby, R. Michael – Psychological Assessment, 2008
In the current investigation, the authors examined the validity of the L-r and K-r scales on the recently developed Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF; Y. S. Ben-Porath & A. Tellegen, in press) in measuring underreported response bias. Three archival samples previously collected for examining MMPI-2…
Descriptors: Schizophrenia, Response Style (Tests), Test Validity, Child Custody
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Burgess, Philip M.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1984
Reevaluated findings for subtle items in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory D Scale in 214 subjects based on the distinction between item subtlety and face validity. Results indicated that the inclusion of nonpathological items in the D scale did not lead to greater predictive validity of depression criteria. (LLL)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Depression (Psychology), Item Analysis, Males
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gynther, Malcolm D.; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979
Divided the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Pd scale into obvious (O), neutral (N), and subtle (S) subscales. Using college students results were: Pd-O scores were the most powerful predictor of criterion; Pd-S scores made a smaller but unique contribution; and Pd-N scores made no contribution not already in Pd-O criterion…
Descriptors: Adults, Item Analysis, Personality Measures, Predictive Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kroger, Rolf O.; Turnbull, William – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975
The hypothesis was tested that subjects fake personality tests by enacting a specific social role, rather than by responding in terms of personality constructs, and that such role faking cannot be detected by validity scales. Results support the hypothesis. (Author)
Descriptors: Personality Measures, Predictive Validity, Reliability, Research Projects
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Osborne, David; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1986
Recent work with the F-K index of the MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory) has reaffirmed its usefulness for identifying dissimulation. Presents normative tables for the F-K index based on a contemporary normative sample of 335 normal women and 304 normal men. (Author/ABB)
Descriptors: Personality Measures, Predictive Validity, Statistical Distributions, Test Norms
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Holcomb, William R.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1984
Tested the validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) with accused murderers (N=96) undergoing pre-trial evaluations. Results indicated four predictors of MMPI elevated scores: low intelligence, history of drug abuse, suspiciousness observed on the ward, and the fact that the accused was a stranger to the victim. (LLL)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Criminals, Males, Personality Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schut, B.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1980
Data obtained from extracted short-forms support a hypothesis that a California Personality Inventory short-form that includes all of those items previously demonstrated to constitute an Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory short-form can be an accurate predictor of the full-version CPI. (Author)
Descriptors: Individual Characteristics, Patients, Personality Measures, Personality Traits
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morris, Louis A.; Shapiro, Arthur K. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974
MMPI values were used to find the relationship of field dependency to personality traits and styles of pathological adjustment in psychiatric outpatients. The investigation had separate analyses for the patient's sex and found it an important variable in predicting the relationship between test score and dependency and adjustment. (ED)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Patients, Personality Measures, Predictive Validity
Edinger, Jack D.; Vosk, Barbara N. – 1983
Of the many short forms of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) that have been developed, the MMPI-168 is among the most promising. To determine whether clinical judgments based on the MMPI-168 are comparable to judgments based on the standard MMPI, 30 clinical psychologists participated in a randomized block, repeated treatment…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Diagnostic Tests, Interrater Reliability, Personality Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Butcher, James N.; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980
Results indicate that short forms of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory may not be accurate substitutes for the standard form in predicting objective measures of psychopathology. Newmark et al, however, reassert their findings that short forms are indeed accurate substitutes. (Author/BEF)
Descriptors: Adults, Correlation, Measurement Techniques, Personality Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Huesmann, L. Rowell; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978
Examined the relationship between scores on the MMPI and concurrent and prior aggression. Analysis indicated sum of T scores for Scales F, 4, and 9 was valid measure of aggression. Composite had a higher reliability than its component scales and discriminated between delinquent and general populations. (Author/BEF)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Aggression, Behavior Rating Scales, Behavioral Science Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Watson, Charles G.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1984
Compared a suicide-completion group to a psychiatric control sample on the 13 traditional MMPI scales, three experimental item pools, and eight profile patterns earlier described as indicative of suicidal tendencies (N=84). The results argue against the use of the MMPI at this time to predict suicide. (JAC)
Descriptors: Patients, Predictive Validity, Psychiatry, Suicide
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3