Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Carlisle, Joanne F. | 1 |
Cortina, Kai Schnabel | 1 |
Cronin, John | 1 |
Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
McCahon, Donna | 1 |
Xiang, Yun | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 3 |
Grade 3 | 3 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Grade 5 | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Grade 7 | 2 |
Grade 8 | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Audience
Location
Michigan | 3 |
Arizona | 1 |
California | 1 |
Colorado | 1 |
Delaware | 1 |
Florida | 1 |
Georgia | 1 |
Idaho | 1 |
Illinois | 1 |
Indiana | 1 |
Kansas | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Carlisle, Joanne F.; Cortina, Kai Schnabel – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2009
The goal of the RF program, Part B of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), is to have all children reading at grade level by the end of third grade. There is no legislative precedent for this program, focused as it is on preventing reading failure in the early elementary years (US Department of Education, April 2002). Because the design of…
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Reading Programs, Goal Orientation, Reading Achievement
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Xiang, Yun; McCahon, Donna – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states have leeway to: (1) Craft their own academic standards, select their own tests, and define…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs