Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Growth Models | 2 |
Predictive Validity | 2 |
Predictor Variables | 2 |
Progress Monitoring | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Academic Standards | 1 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Achievement Gains | 1 |
Adaptive Testing | 1 |
At Risk Students | 1 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Daniel F. McCaffrey | 1 |
Emily R. Forcht | 1 |
Ethan R. Van Norman | 1 |
Joseph A. Martineau | 1 |
Katherine E. Castellano | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Katherine E. Castellano; Daniel F. McCaffrey; Joseph A. Martineau – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2025
Growth-to-standard models evaluate student growth against the growth needed to reach a future standard or target of interest, such as proficiency. A common growth-to-standard model involves comparing the popular Student Growth Percentile (SGP) to Adequate Growth Percentiles (AGPs). AGPs follow from an involved process based on fitting a series of…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Growth Models, Student Educational Objectives, Educational Indicators
Ethan R. Van Norman; Emily R. Forcht – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2024
This study evaluated the forecasting accuracy of trend estimation methods applied to time-series data from computer adaptive tests (CATs). Data were collected roughly once a month over the course of a school year. We evaluated the forecasting accuracy of two regression-based growth estimation methods (ordinary least squares and Theil-Sen). The…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Predictive Measurement, Predictive Validity, Predictor Variables