Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Effect Size | 3 |
Intervals | 3 |
Probability | 3 |
Robustness (Statistics) | 2 |
Alternative Assessment | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
Computer Software | 1 |
Criticism | 1 |
Error of Measurement | 1 |
Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
Internet | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Psychological Methods | 3 |
Author
Algina, James | 2 |
Keselman, H. J. | 2 |
Deering, Kathleen N. | 1 |
Lix, Lisa M. | 1 |
Marin-Martinez, Fulgencio | 1 |
Penfield, Randall D. | 1 |
Sanchez-Meca, Julio | 1 |
Wilcox, Rand R. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sanchez-Meca, Julio; Marin-Martinez, Fulgencio – Psychological Methods, 2008
One of the main objectives in meta-analysis is to estimate the overall effect size by calculating a confidence interval (CI). The usual procedure consists of assuming a standard normal distribution and a sampling variance defined as the inverse of the sum of the estimated weights of the effect sizes. But this procedure does not take into account…
Descriptors: Intervals, Monte Carlo Methods, Meta Analysis, Effect Size
A Generally Robust Approach for Testing Hypotheses and Setting Confidence Intervals for Effect Sizes
Keselman, H. J.; Algina, James; Lix, Lisa M.; Wilcox, Rand R.; Deering, Kathleen N. – Psychological Methods, 2008
Standard least squares analysis of variance methods suffer from poor power under arbitrarily small departures from normality and fail to control the probability of a Type I error when standard assumptions are violated. This article describes a framework for robust estimation and testing that uses trimmed means with an approximate degrees of…
Descriptors: Intervals, Testing, Least Squares Statistics, Effect Size
Algina, James; Keselman, H. J.; Penfield, Randall D. – Psychological Methods, 2005
The authors argue that a robust version of Cohen's effect size constructed by replacing population means with 20% trimmed means and the population standard deviation with the square root of a 20% Winsorized variance is a better measure of population separation than is Cohen's effect size. The authors investigated coverage probability for…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Intervals, Robustness (Statistics), Probability