Descriptor
Analogy | 4 |
Cognitive Structures | 4 |
College Science | 4 |
Higher Education | 4 |
Problem Solving | 4 |
Science Education | 4 |
Learning Processes | 3 |
Science Instruction | 3 |
Concept Formation | 2 |
Learning Strategies | 2 |
Physics | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Clement, John | 4 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 4 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Clement, John – 1987
Evidence from video tapes of experts thinking aloud and using analogies in scientific problem solving is presented. Four processes appear to be important in using an analogy: (1) generating the analogy; (2) establishing confidence in the validity of the analogy relation; (3) understanding the analogous case; and (4) applying findings to the…
Descriptors: Analogy, Cognitive Structures, Cognitive Style, College Science
Clement, John – 1978
This paper attempts to show that it is possible to analyze a problem solving protocol in which the subject spontaneously generates a series of analogies. The qualitative physics problem given to the subject describes a situation where that which is unfamiliar is often solved by relating it to several analogous situations that are more familiar.…
Descriptors: Analogy, Cognitive Structures, College Science, Higher Education
Clement, John – 1983
This paper presents evidence to indicate that spontaneously generated analogies can play a significant role in the problem solving process of scientifically trained individuals. In addition, it is suggested that these individuals exhibit more than one method for generating analogies. Ten scientists (representing physics, mathematics, and computer…
Descriptors: Analogy, Cognitive Structures, College Science, Concept Formation
Clement, John – 1987
In this study 34 spontaneous analogies produced by 16 college freshmen while solving qualitative physics problems are analyzed. A number of the analogies were invalid in the sense that they led to an incorrect answer from the physicist's point of view. However, many were valid, and a few were powerful in the sense that they seemed not only to help…
Descriptors: Analogy, Cognitive Structures, College Science, Concept Formation