Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Annual Reports | 5 |
| Program Administration | 5 |
| Program Budgeting | 5 |
| Compensatory Education | 4 |
| Disadvantaged Youth | 4 |
| Federal Programs | 4 |
| Program Evaluation | 4 |
| Program Development | 3 |
| Agency Cooperation | 2 |
| Educational Finance | 2 |
| Measurement Instruments | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| US Department of Education | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Arizona | 1 |
| New Mexico | 1 |
| Rhode Island | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 4 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textBureau of Elementary and Secondary Education (DHEW/OE), Washington, DC. – 1965
Published in 1965, these guidelines outline the requirements for the fiscal and general administration of Title I projects, for project design and evaluation, and for reporting project activities. Exhibits of forms for reporting activities and administrative procedures at the state and local levels are included. (LB)
Descriptors: Annual Reports, Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Federal Programs
US Department of Education, 2007
Five years ago the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) launched a revolution in our education system by insisting that all students should be proficient in reading and math by 2014 and demanding comprehensive reforms to reach this national goal, including strong assessment and accountability systems, a highly qualified teacher in every classroom, more…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation, State Standards, Educational Finance
Arizona State Dept. of Public Instruction, Phoenix. – 1966
THE FIRST SECTION OF THIS REPORT DESCRIBES HOW TITLE I ACTIVITIES WERE INITIATED IN ARIZONA AND THE VICISSITUDES OF COORDINATING THEM WITH OTHER PROJECTS FUNDED UNDER THE ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT AND OTHER FEDERAL ACTS. MAJOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROBLEMS INCLUDED (1) UNDERSTAFFING WHICH HINDERED THE STATE IN PROCESSING PROPOSALS, (2)…
Descriptors: Agency Cooperation, Annual Reports, Community Action, Compensatory Education
DELAYO, LEONARD; FITZPATRICK, MILDRED – 1966
THE BULK OF THIS EVALUATION REPORT OF NEW MEXICO'S TITLE I PROJECTS IS A SERIES OF APPENDIXES. HOWEVER ONE SECTION OF TEXT OUTLINES THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PROJECTS (BUDGET, PERSONNEL, ETC.) AND ANOTHER THEIR ADMINISTRATION AT THE STATE LEVEL (CRITERIA FOR PROJECT APPROVAL, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND CONSULTATIVE SERVICES, FISCAL MANAGEMENT, ETC.).…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Annual Reports, Compensatory Education, Consultants
Rhode Island State Dept. of Education, Providence. – 1966
THE RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMINISTERED ITS ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT TITLE I PROGRAMS THROUGH A SPECIALLY ESTABLISHED OFFICE WHICH SERVED THE LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES. THE TITLE I COORDINATOR INFORMED LOCAL UNITS OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT AND PROVIDED CONSULTANTS TO HELP IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSALS. EVALUATION…
Descriptors: Agency Cooperation, Annual Reports, Compensatory Education, Cooperative Programs
