Descriptor
| Compensatory Education | 174 |
| Program Administration | 174 |
| Program Evaluation | 101 |
| Federal Programs | 97 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 64 |
| Disadvantaged Youth | 43 |
| Educationally Disadvantaged | 39 |
| School Districts | 39 |
| Program Development | 37 |
| State Programs | 31 |
| Program Descriptions | 30 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Education and Urban Society | 2 |
| IRCD Bulletin | 2 |
| AGB Reports | 1 |
| Australian Journal of Early… | 1 |
| Exceptional Children | 1 |
| Integrated Education | 1 |
| Urban Education | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
| California | 10 |
| New York (New York) | 6 |
| Ohio | 5 |
| Georgia | 4 |
| Michigan | 4 |
| New York | 4 |
| Arkansas | 3 |
| Kansas | 3 |
| Massachusetts | 3 |
| Pennsylvania | 3 |
| Arizona | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| California Achievement Tests | 2 |
| Metropolitan Achievement Tests | 2 |
| Stanford Achievement Tests | 2 |
| Comprehensive Tests of Basic… | 1 |
| Iowa Tests of Basic Skills | 1 |
| Sequential Tests of… | 1 |
| Stanford Diagnostic Reading… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Washington, DC. – 1977
This document presents an overview of the basis for the program requirements applicable to local school districts applying for grants under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. The study's basic research objective is to determine what additions, deletions, or clarifications are needed within the Title I legal framework to…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Definitions, Federal Legislation, Federal Programs
Download full textOregon State Dept. of Education, Salem. – 1977
The amended guidelines for Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, as revised by the Oregon Department of Education, are presented in this document. It consolidates instructions for completing applications. The purpose of Title I is explained briefly. The first two steps prior to applying are to identify the project target area or…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Cooperative Programs, Coordination, Federal Programs
Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. House Committee on Education and Labor. – 1991
As approved by the Committee on Education and Labor, House Resolution 2312 clarifies the intent of Congress with regard to several provisions enacted into law by the Augustus F. Hawkins Human Services Reauthorization Act of 1990. The resolution also makes technical and conforming corrections to the Follow Through Act and the Head Start Transition…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Elementary Education, Federal Legislation, Federal Programs
Georgia State Dept. of Education, Atlanta. Office of Instructional Services. – 1977
This manual provides regulations to assist local education agencies in Georgia in planning, designing and implementing programs of compensatory education for Title I eligible children. The areas considered under program planning include: the responsibilities of local educational agencies, allocation and reallocation of funds, accounting of fiscal…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Cooperative Programs, Coordination, Federal Programs
Dallas Independent School District, TX. Dept. of Research and Evaluation. – 1980
Evaluation summaries for 56 programs implemented by The Dallas Independent School District during the 1979-80 school year are highlighted in this report. Each summary is listed under one of the following sections: Title I Projects; State Compensatory Education Projects; Emergency School Aid Act Projects; Title IV-C Projects; and Other Projects.…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Educational Objectives, Elementary Secondary Education, Program Administration
Fox, Louise W. – 1969
It is claimed that the funded program, the subject of this study, never existed per se, except on paper. It was found that over half of the schools did not receive new project personnel designated under program guidelines. Moreover, substantial numbers of principals and teachers did not even know their schools were participating in the program.…
Descriptors: Attendance, Compensatory Education, Federal Programs, Program Administration
Peer reviewedRaffel, Jeffrey A. – Urban Education, 1976
This analysis of the Follow Through program as attempted in Wilmington suggests that the implementation of the experimental treatment is problematic at best, that quantitative analysis of the national results of this quasi-experimental program may provide us with information that is of limited validity and utility, and that the call to treat…
Descriptors: Administrative Problems, Compensatory Education, Elementary Education, Program Administration
Gall, Mary Sheila – 1991
This report provides results of a review of the methodology used by the Office of Human Development Services (HDS) to measure Head Start performance and to control high risk Head Start agencies. The review was performed at HDS headquarters and regional locations nationwide. The review was based on a sample of 200 Head Start agencies and focused on…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Efficiency, Evaluation Criteria, Federal Programs
Weil, Jane – 1986
The expansion of Project Head Start in Maine to the point of serving nearly 25 percent of eligible children is detailed in this report. Section I describes the expansion and some of its benefits, such as equalization of services across county boundaries and the establishment of a uniform unit cost-per-child for use in appropriating state funds.…
Descriptors: Background, Compensatory Education, Early Childhood Education, Educational Finance
Peer reviewedZusman, Richard – Integrated Education, 1974
Emphasizes that their participation will develop more comprehensive needs assessment and evaluation procedures; part of the Title I funds will go directly back to the target areas, and parent involvement will result in better acceptance of Title I throughout the communities. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Advisory Committees, Community Attitudes, Compensatory Education, Educational Change
Thiemann, Francis C.; Deflaminis, John A. – 1978
This paper summarizes a study of Title I regulations and related problems which local administrators in Jefferson County, Kentucky dealt with. More specifically, the study determined which, if any, regulations were significant factors which created problems in the desegregation process and what administrative actions were taken to overcome them.…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Desegregation Effects, Desegregation Plans, Educational Problems
Murray, James R.; Beaven, D. F. – 1977
This survey was conducted during the 1975-1976 school year, in order to provide a description of the nature and extent of services provided for compensatory education by school districts using Federal Title I funds and/or State funds. Information in three broad areas was sought: fiscal, compensatory education practices, and recipient descriptions.…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Compensatory Education, Elementary Secondary Education, National Surveys
PDF pending restorationReisner, Elizabeth R. – 1980
The purpose of this report is to review the actions of the United States Office of Education (OE) in the administration and operation of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, as amended by the 1978 Education Amendments. The report describes the changes Congress mandated OE to implement and examines OE's response to these specific…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation, Federal Programs
Minneapolis Public Schools, Minn. – 1966
THESE ABSTRACTS DESCRIBE TITLE I COMPENSATORY EDUCATION PROJECTS CONDUCTED FOR DISADVANTAGED YOUTH IN THE MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS DURING 1965-66. EACH ABSTRACT LISTS THE PROJECT'S ADMINISTRATOR, APPROVAL DATE AND DURATION, BUDGET, PARTICIPATING SCHOOLS, AND PERSONNEL, AND PROVIDES A BRIEF NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF EACH PROJECT. (LB)
Descriptors: Abstracts, Budgets, Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth
KENYON, RAYMOND G. – 1966
THIS REPORT CONTAINS THE RESULTS OF A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY OF TITLE I PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. A QUESTIONNAIRE REQUESTED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION--NAME OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT, PROJECT DESCRIPTION, TYPE OF PROJECT (CURRICULUM, MULTIMEDIA, STUDENT-PERSONNEL SERVICES, ADMINISTRATIVE, OR OTHER), NUMBER OF PUPILS SERVED,…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs
