Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Program Development | 5 |
Administration | 3 |
Program Evaluation | 3 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Needs Assessment | 2 |
Planning | 2 |
Program Administration | 2 |
Acquired Immune Deficiency… | 1 |
Administrators | 1 |
Delivery Systems | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Evaluation and Program… | 5 |
Author
Bosin, Morris Robert | 1 |
Bunker, Douglas R. | 1 |
Ellis, Peter T. | 1 |
Green, Rex S. | 1 |
Schalock, Robert L. | 1 |
Starley, Richard O. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Green, Rex S.; Ellis, Peter T. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2008
In 2003 foster youth employed by a foster youth advocacy organization suggested that an evaluation of group home services to foster youth be conducted in Alameda County, California. This report presents the development and conduct of this evaluation study; how funding was obtained; and how foster youth were hired, trained, and employed to produce…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Group Homes, Program Effectiveness, Foster Care

Bunker, Douglas R. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1978
Evaluation is often both conceptually and functionally separate from program planning and operations management. There are a number of potentially beneficial side effects to be realized from close collaboration between program administrators and evaluators: when the evaluation task is broadly defined and when both administrators recognize their…
Descriptors: Administration, Educational Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Organizational Communication

Bosin, Morris Robert – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1992
Priority setting is examined from the perspective of planning practitioners operating in a major federal regulatory agency. Causes of ambivalence in setting priorities are considered, and ways to reduce ambivalence are suggested. Three models are proposed for setting priorities in the public sector. (SLD)
Descriptors: Federal Government, Government Role, Models, Needs Assessment

Schalock, Robert L. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1994
The current conceptualization in the mental retardation-developmental disability field regarding quality of life, quality enhancement, and quality assurance is summarized. Implications of these issues for program planning and evaluation are discussed, with attention to management and a framework for quality assurance. (SLD)
Descriptors: Administration, Developmental Disabilities, Evaluation Methods, Guides

Starley, Richard O. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1994
Selected executive directors of local and national Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) service organizations were asked about their need and desire for a national organization. Replies of 12 local and 8 national directors confirmed the desire for such an organization and suggested various models for its organization. (SLD)
Descriptors: Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, Administration, Administrators, Delivery Systems