Descriptor
| Critical Path Method | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Problem Solving | 2 |
| Program Administration | 2 |
| Program Development | 2 |
| Administrative Problems | 1 |
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Education | 1 |
| Educational Planning | 1 |
| Health Programs | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| ARNOLD, MARY F. | 1 |
| Miller, Donald R. | 1 |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
| California (San Francisco) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
PDF pending restorationMiller, Donald R. – 1968
This document analyzes the planning, developing, and implementing of fundable Title III, ESEA projects, by integrating the following five strategies: (1) A planning development and implementation strategy, (2) a risk-gain motivation strategy, (3) a problem-solving strategy, (4) a quality assurance and evaluation strategy, and (5) a management…
Descriptors: Critical Path Method, Educational Planning, Models, Problem Solving
ARNOLD, MARY F.; AND OTHERS – 1966
THE MAIN ADVANTAGE OF THE PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW TECHNIQUE (PERT) IS THE PROVISION OF A GRAPHIC MODEL OF ACTIVITIES WITH ESTIMATES OF THE TIME, RESOURCES, PERSONNEL, AND FACILITIES NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH A SEQUENCE OF INTERDEPENDENT ACTIVITIES, AS IN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION. A PERT MODEL CAN ALSO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION BETWEEN PERSONS AND…
Descriptors: Administrative Problems, Adult Education, Critical Path Method, Decision Making
