Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Source
Family Relations | 1 |
Journal of Applied Behavior… | 1 |
MDRC | 1 |
RAND Corporation | 1 |
Society for Research in Child… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 6 |
Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Policymakers | 11 |
Practitioners | 5 |
Researchers | 5 |
Administrators | 1 |
Location
New York (New York) | 2 |
California | 1 |
California (Los Angeles) | 1 |
California (Oakland) | 1 |
Colorado (Denver) | 1 |
Louisiana (New Orleans) | 1 |
Michigan (Detroit) | 1 |
Oklahoma (Tulsa) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Hawkins Stafford Act 1988 | 4 |
Education Consolidation… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Megan Schwartz – MDRC, 2025
For decades, most states have made a practice of giving citizens returning from prison or jail a small amount of money, called "gate money," to cover the cost of transportation and other immediate needs. Many legislatures have considered increasing the dollar amount of their cash assistance and offering this kind of support more widely.…
Descriptors: Institutionalized Persons, Recidivism, Financial Support, Pilot Projects
Shlafer, Rebecca J.; Poehlmann, Julie; Coffino, Brianna; Hanneman, Ashley – Family Relations, 2009
We investigated children and families who were participating in a mentoring program targeting children with incarcerated parents. Using multiple methods and informants, we explored the development of the mentoring relationship, challenges and benefits of mentoring children with incarcerated parents, and match termination in 57 mentor-child dyads.…
Descriptors: Mentors, Institutionalized Persons, Program Descriptions, Interpersonal Relationship
Turner, Susan; Fain, Terry; Sehgal, Amber – RAND Corporation, 2007
In 2000, the California State Legislature passed the Schiff-Cardenas Crime Prevention Act, which authorized funding for county juvenile justice programs and designated the Corrections Standards Authority (CSA), formerly named the Board of Corrections, the administrator of funding. California counties receiving state funds for Juvenile Justice…
Descriptors: Program Implementation, Intervention, Crime, Crime Prevention
Evaluation of Components of Residential Treatment by Medicaid ICF-MR Surveys: A Validity Assessment.

Reid, Dennis H.; And Others – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1991
Four studies found serious problems with components of the federal Medicaid program's survey process for evaluating intermediate care facilities for the mentally retarded--surveys did not discriminate between certified and noncertified units, direct-care staff behavior was very reactive to the survey's presence, and service providers had divergent…
Descriptors: Attendants, Caregivers, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems
Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. House Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families. – 1987
This document contains witnesses' testimonies and prepared statements from the Congressional hearing called to examine the living conditions of children in state care. Parents, youth workers, legal advocates, program administrators and state officials discuss the cost effectiveness of community-based services and the effectiveness of various…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Child Advocacy, Child Welfare, Children
LeBlanc, Linda A.; And Others – 1991
A 3-year study of the operation of Chapter 1 Neglected or Delinquent (Chapter 1 N or D) Program, which provides compensatory education services to youths in state-operated juvenile and adult correctional facilities, was conducted. The study found that Chapter 1 N or D Program participants had the following characteristics: (1) over half of the…
Descriptors: Adult Education, Compensatory Education, Correctional Education, Delinquent Rehabilitation
LeBlanc, Linda A.; Ratnofsky, Alexander – 1991
Part of a 3-year study of the Chapter 1 Neglected or Delinquent (Chapter 1 N or D) Program providing compensatory education services to youth in state-operated juvenile and adult correctional facilities, this report presents findings of a longitudinal component designed to assess prerelease services and postrelease experiences. Participants in the…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Correctional Education, Delinquent Rehabilitation, Employment Patterns
Tashjian, Michael D.; And Others – 1991
Part of a 3-year study of the Chapter 1 Neglected or Delinquent (Chapter 1 N or D) Program, which provides compensatory education services to youth in state-operated juvenile and adult correctional facilities, this report presents descriptive findings in the following five areas: (1) characteristics of youth; (2) correctional education; (3)…
Descriptors: Adult Education, Compensatory Education, Correctional Education, Delinquent Rehabilitation
Torres, Marcia; And Others – 1990
This report presents a final evaluation of the Chapter 1, Part B Program for Neglected and Delinquent Children, Citywide/District 75 Institutionalized Facilities Program. This program was designed to provide after-school supplementary instruction in prevocational skills, activities of daily living, and academic remediation to students between the…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Curriculum Enrichment, Daily Living Skills, Elementary Secondary Education
Rowe, Brenda J. D.; Pfannenstiel, Judy C. – 1991
Part of a 3-year study of the Chapter 1 Neglected or Delinquent (Chapter 1 N or D) Program providing compensatory education services to youths in state-operated juvenile and adult correctional facilities, this report presents case studies of nine facilities that have developed particularly effective programs. The study used teacher questionnaires,…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Compensatory Education, Correctional Education, Delinquent Rehabilitation
Dodge, Kenneth A.; Dishion, Thomas J.; Lansford, Jennifer E. – Society for Research in Child Development, 2006
The problem is well known to every parent of a teenager, every high school teacher, every clinical practitioner, and every social policy maker: vulnerable adolescents risk becoming more deviant through association with deviant peers and peer groups. Deviant peer influences are among the most potent factors in the development of antisocial…
Descriptors: Antisocial Behavior, Adolescents, Peer Groups, Program Effectiveness