Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Source
Assistive Technology Outcomes… | 10 |
Author
Arthanat, Sajay | 2 |
Bauer, Stephen M. | 2 |
Abraham, Linzy | 1 |
Breslin-Larson, Joan | 1 |
Clendon, Sally | 1 |
Edyburn, Dave | 1 |
Edyburn, Dave L. | 1 |
Erickson, Karen A. | 1 |
Fennema-Jansen, Sally | 1 |
Flagg, Jennifer L. | 1 |
Floyd, Kim K. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 10 |
Reports - Research | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 4 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Adult Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Kentucky | 1 |
Minnesota | 1 |
New York | 1 |
North Carolina | 1 |
Oregon | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Floyd, Kim K.; Judge, Sharon L. – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2012
Despite the large increase of students with learning disabilities (LD) entering postsecondary institutions and the legislative emphasis on providing students with disabilities equal access to education, we have yet to develop comprehensive planning of accommodations for postsecondary students with LD in regard to assistive technology (AT). The…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Learning Disabilities, Educational Technology, Assistive Technology
Bauer, Stephen M.; Arthanat, Sajay – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2010
The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the impact of Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer Research (STTR) grant programs of 5 federal agencies National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Science Foundation (NSF), U.S. Department of Education (USDE), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and…
Descriptors: Awards, Technology Transfer, Disabilities, Program Effectiveness
Bauer, Stephen M.; Flagg, Jennifer L. – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2010
A standard and comprehensive model is needed to evaluate and compare technology transfer systems and the stakeholders within these systems. The principle systems considered include federal laboratories, U.S. universities, the rehabilitation engineering research centers (RERCs), and large small business innovation research programs. An earlier…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Technology Transfer, Program Effectiveness, Educational Technology
Stone, Vathsala I.; Lockett, Michelle; Usiak, Douglas J.; Arthanat, Sajay – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2010
This paper presents methodology and findings from three product efficacy studies that verify the quality of life benefits resulting from prior research, development, and transfer activities. The paper then discusses key lessons learned with implications for product evaluation practice. The studies assessed the quality of three assistive technology…
Descriptors: Summative Evaluation, Quality of Life, Technology Transfer, Program Effectiveness
Peterson-Karlan, George R. – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2011
The trends and findings from a descriptive analysis of 25 years of research studies examining the effectiveness of technology to support the compositional writing of students with learning and academic disabilities are presented. A corpus of 85 applied research studies of writing technology effectiveness was identified from among 249 items in the…
Descriptors: Evidence, Writing (Composition), Editing, Writing Processes
Thurlow, Martha; Tindal, Gerald; Powers, Richard; Lewis, Preston; Laitusis, Cara Cahalan; Breslin-Larson, Joan – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2007
Current educational policies require the participation of students with disabilities in state assessments. Their participation has raised a number of issues, among them the need for accommodations. In this article we consider the role that assistive technology (AT) can play to alleviate current accommodations demands, and highlight research and…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Educational Technology, Assistive Technology, Testing Accommodations
Hill, Katya – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2006
Case studies are an accepted method for reporting treatment outcomes. However, to be useful and authentic, a systematic and principled approach to collecting, analyzing, and reporting case data must be observed. This paper proposes a basic case study format for documenting augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention to ensure…
Descriptors: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Quality of Life, Cerebral Palsy, Program Effectiveness
Edyburn, Dave; Fennema-Jansen, Sally; Hariharan, Prabha; Smith, Roger – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2005
While the importance of measuring the outcomes of assistive technology (AT) is well documented, less information is available about how outcome data collection can be integrated into daily professional practice. The metaphor of a snapshot provides an intriguing method for thinking about the collection of AT outcome data. The purpose of this…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Educational Technology, Assistive Technology, Data Collection
Edyburn, Dave L.; Smith, Roger O. – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2004
The topic of assistive technology (AT) outcomes has only recently received attention in the professional literature. As a result, there is a considerable void in the profession's ability to address contemporary questions about the value and use of AT. The purpose of this article is to highlight the theory, development, and research efforts of the…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Educational Technology, Assistive Technology, Research and Development
Erickson, Karen A.; Clendon, Sally; Abraham, Linzy; Roy, Vicky; Van de Carr, Hillary – Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2005
Three classroom teachers and their 23 students with significant developmental disabilities were studied across 8 weeks as a new literacy and communication instructional program, "MEville" to "WEville," was implemented. Before and after the implementation, the students were tested on a variety of literacy measures, their…
Descriptors: Intervention, Teachers, Literacy, Developmental Disabilities