Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Bias | 2 |
Intervention | 2 |
Program Effectiveness | 2 |
Program Evaluation | 2 |
Research Design | 2 |
Research Methodology | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 1 |
Meta Analysis | 1 |
Randomized Controlled Trials | 1 |
Taxonomy | 1 |
Source
Research Synthesis Methods | 2 |
Author
Valentine, Jeffrey C. | 2 |
Deeks, Jonathan J. | 1 |
Higgins, Julian P. T. | 1 |
Ramsay, Craig | 1 |
Reeves, Barnaby C. | 1 |
Shea, Beverley | 1 |
Thompson, Simon G. | 1 |
Tugwell, Peter | 1 |
Wells, George | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Higgins, Julian P. T.; Ramsay, Craig; Reeves, Barnaby C.; Deeks, Jonathan J.; Shea, Beverley; Valentine, Jeffrey C.; Tugwell, Peter; Wells, George – Research Synthesis Methods, 2013
Non-randomized studies may provide valuable evidence on the effects of interventions. They are the main source of evidence on the intended effects of some types of interventions and often provide the only evidence about the effects of interventions on long-term outcomes, rare events or adverse effects. Therefore, systematic reviews on the effects…
Descriptors: Research Methodology, Intervention, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation
Valentine, Jeffrey C.; Thompson, Simon G. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2013
Background: Confounding caused by selection bias is often a key difference between non-randomized studies (NRS) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions. Key methodological issues: In this third paper of the series, we consider issues relating to the inclusion of NRS in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions. We discuss…
Descriptors: Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials, Intervention, Bias