Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Educational Legislation | 5 |
Program Effectiveness | 5 |
Tutorial Programs | 5 |
Federal Legislation | 4 |
Tutoring | 3 |
After School Programs | 2 |
Educational Quality | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Parent Participation | 2 |
Program Implementation | 2 |
Supplementary Education | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Annenberg Institute for… | 1 |
Economics of Education Review | 1 |
Forum on Public Policy Online | 1 |
Minnesota Office of Higher… | 1 |
Teacher Magazine | 1 |
Author
Christina, Rachel | 1 |
Greer, Diana L. | 1 |
Groom-Thomas, Leiah | 1 |
Hamilton, Laura | 1 |
Jacobson, Linda | 1 |
Loeb, Susanna | 1 |
Meyen, Edward L. | 1 |
Poggio, John C. | 1 |
Walters, Nancy | 1 |
White, Sara | 1 |
Zimmer, Ron | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
High Schools | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Policymakers | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
Education Reform Act 1988… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards | 1 |
White, Sara; Groom-Thomas, Leiah; Loeb, Susanna – Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, 2022
This study synthesizes existing research on the implementation of tutoring programs which we define as one-to-one or small-group instruction in which a human tutor supports students grades K-12 in an academic subject area. Tutoring has emerged as an especially promising strategy for supporting students' academic success with strong causal evidence…
Descriptors: Tutoring, After School Education, Tutorial Programs, Program Implementation
Zimmer, Ron; Hamilton, Laura; Christina, Rachel – Economics of Education Review, 2010
The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation has created pressure for districts to improve their students' proficiency levels on state tests. Districts that fail to meet their academic targets for 3 years must use their Title I funds to pay for supplemental education services (SES) that provide tutoring or other academic instruction. Many…
Descriptors: Tutoring, After School Programs, Public Schools, Urban Schools
Meyen, Edward L.; Greer, Diana L.; Poggio, John C. – Forum on Public Policy Online, 2008
The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation in the United States is not equivalent to a national curriculum; however, it does set forth some conditions essential for enhancing student achievement at scale (e.g., curriculum standards, assessment standards, and expectations of compliance). The missing component within these conditions is support for…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, Academic Standards, Alignment (Education)
Jacobson, Linda – Teacher Magazine, 2006
Under the No Child Left Behind Act, districts that have failed to demonstrate adequate yearly progress for two years in a row must pay for low-income students' private-sector tutoring. As No Child Left Behind enters its fifth year, a report by the Washington, DC, nonprofit Center on Education Policy found that of about 300 districts surveyed, 10…
Descriptors: Educational Quality, Tutorial Programs, Federal Legislation, Educational Policy
Walters, Nancy – Minnesota Office of Higher Education, 2009
The purpose of this report is to provide information on the outcomes of the Intervention for College Attendance Program, a program of competitive grants awarded to postsecondary institutions, professional organizations, and community-based organizations. Prior to the 2008-09 biennium, the program focused on provision of college awareness and the…
Descriptors: Higher Education, High Schools, Intervention, Educational Finance