Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Evidence Based Practice | 2 |
Program Effectiveness | 2 |
Synthesis | 2 |
Validity | 2 |
Behavior Modification | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Decision Making | 1 |
Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
Evaluation Methods | 1 |
Evidence | 1 |
Generalizability Theory | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Barton, Erin E. | 1 |
Büchter, Roland | 1 |
Ledford, Jennifer R. | 1 |
Lloyd, Blair P. | 1 |
Mathes, Tim | 1 |
Pieper, Dawid | 1 |
Pustejovsky, James E. | 1 |
Severini, Katherine E. | 1 |
Weise, Alina | 1 |
Zimmerman, Kathleen N. | 1 |
Publication Type
Information Analyses | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Weise, Alina; Büchter, Roland; Pieper, Dawid; Mathes, Tim – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Background: Evidence syntheses provide the basis for evidence-based decision making in healthcare. To judge the certainty of findings for the specific decision context evidence syntheses should consider context suitability (ie, generalizability, external validity, applicability or transferability). Our objective was to determine the status quo and…
Descriptors: Evidence, Synthesis, Evidence Based Practice, Decision Making
Zimmerman, Kathleen N.; Ledford, Jennifer R.; Severini, Katherine E.; Pustejovsky, James E.; Barton, Erin E.; Lloyd, Blair P. – Grantee Submission, 2018
Tools for evaluating the quality and rigor of single case research designs (SCD) are often used when conducting SCD syntheses. Preferred components include evaluations of design features related to the internal validity of SCD to obtain quality and/or rigor ratings. Three tools for evaluating the quality and rigor of SCD (Council for Exceptional…
Descriptors: Research Design, Evaluation Methods, Synthesis, Validity