Descriptor
| Dropout Prevention | 2 |
| Dropouts | 2 |
| Identification | 2 |
| Potential Dropouts | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Freshmen | 1 |
| Differences | 1 |
| High Risk Students | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Incidence | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Schreiner, Laurie A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Texas State Dept. of Community Affairs, Austin. Training and Employment Development Div. – 1986
As a response to legislative demands, the Texas School Dropout Survey described in this document attempted to identify the magnitude of the dropout problem, regional characteristics or causes of the problem, costs associated with dropping out, and programs currently available for serving the dropout population. Twenty-four major findings of the…
Descriptors: Differences, Dropout Prevention, Dropouts, Identification
Download full textSchreiner, Laurie A.; And Others – 1988
This study examined the Stratil Counseling Inventory (SCI) used for identifying college freshmen prone to dropping out and a program designed to increase student retention which stresses early, frequent, and rewarding faculty-student contact. The SCI was administered to college freshmen (N=213) who became involved in a retention management program…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Freshmen, Dropout Prevention, Dropouts
