Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Control Groups | 2 |
| Experimental Groups | 2 |
| Learning Problems | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Educational Diagnosis | 1 |
| Elementary School Mathematics | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Generalization | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkSteele, Sara C. – EBP Briefs (Evidence-based Practice Briefs), 2014
Clinical Question: Do school-age children with language learning difficulties who receive morphological-based intervention show improvement in word knowledge relative to a comparison intervention or control condition? Method: Systematic Review. Sources: ERIC, ASHAWire, PsycINFO, Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA). Search Terms:…
Descriptors: Morphology (Languages), Intervention, Learning Problems, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedChu, Yian-Shu; Yang, Haw-Ching; Tseng, Shian-Shyong; Yang, Che-Ching – Educational Technology & Society, 2014
Of all teaching methods, one-to-one human tutoring is the most powerful method for promoting learning. To achieve this aim and reduce teaching load, researchers developed intelligent tutoring systems (ITSs) to employ one-to-one tutoring (Aleven, McLaren, & Sewall, 2009; Aleven, McLaren, Sewall, & Koedinger, 2009; Anderson, Corbett,…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Grade 5, Elementary School Mathematics, Intelligent Tutoring Systems
