Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 3 |
| Evaluation Problems | 3 |
| Program Effectiveness | 3 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| Educational Assessment | 2 |
| Norm Referenced Tests | 2 |
| Program Evaluation | 2 |
| Test Reliability | 2 |
| Classification | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Instruction | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
| Translations | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Preschool Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| Austria | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Education Consolidation… | 1 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Pediatric Evaluation of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMacy, Marisa; Bagnato, Stephen J. – NHSA Dialog, 2010
The inclusion of young children with disabilities has remained a function of the Head Start program since its inception in the 1960s when the United States Congress mandated that children with disabilities comprise 10% of the Head Start enrollment (Zigler & Styfco, 2000). Standardized, norm-referenced tests used to identify children with…
Descriptors: Performance Based Assessment, Disadvantaged Youth, Norm Referenced Tests, Disabilities
Download full textvan der Ploeg, Arie J.; And Others – 1986
The effectiveness of an Education Consolidation Improvement Act Chapter 1 program was studied in a large urban school district. A common problem in evaluating remedial programs is that pretest/posttest achievement gains often indicate the effects of the entire curriculum, rather than those specific to the remedial class. In this district, over…
Descriptors: Core Curriculum, Effect Size, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods
Patry, Jean-Luc; Gastager, Angela – Quality of Higher Education, 2004
A taxonomy of potential values conflicts in evaluations is presented. Basis is the distinction of types of conflict (aims vs. means conflicts; qualitative vs. quantitative conflicts). Six areas of values are discussed: the ethical, methodical, social and interactive, legal, economic, and personal values. The taxonomy of conflicts between these…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, Classification, Values, Conflict
